Search for: "Others unknown to Plaintiff" Results 841 - 860 of 2,368
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Dec 2009, 5:45 pm by Robinson, Calcagnie & Robinson
One of the consequences to the community of such an extension is the cost of insuring against liability of unknown but potentially massive dimension. [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 2:26 am
  Plaintiffs may like to think so in some cases, but won't the single injury rule and statute of limitations bite them in others? [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 12:32 pm by Eric
The court says: Plaintiff has offered no evidence that Defendants marketed their site by emphasizing Plaintiff’s appearance on the site, used portions of the posts in teasers on other sites to draw more visitors, prominently displayed the posts regarding Plaintiff on the site, advertised Plaintiff’s appearance in connection with the sale of any of Defendants’ products, or charged higher premiums to advertisers for advertising space on… [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 9:23 am by PaulKostro
The cause of a fire is generally unknown, fires commonly occur where due care has been exercised as well as where due care was wanting. [read post]
5 May 2022, 2:26 pm by Larry
For anyone other than the importer of record, the standard is "don't be negligent. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 12:04 pm by Eleonora Rosati
The Supreme Court set out a number of elements in support of this position:The trade mark, although registered for 38 years, was almost unknown on the market;It had not been proved that any product bearing the infringed trade mark was marketed in the shops indicated by the plaintiff;The turnover of the products bearing the infringed trademark had always been negligible;No evidence had been provided that the trade mark had ever been advertised and, on the basis of “some checks… [read post]
14 Nov 2007, 9:59 pm
Docket No. 07-01798-CV-ACC-KRS MARK DEAN SCHWAB, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, OTHER UNKNOWN EMPLOYEES AND AGENTS, Florida Department of Corrections, Defendants-Appellants. -------------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida -------------------------- (November 15, 2007) Before DUBINA, CARNES, and HULL, Circuit Judges. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 8:43 am by Sara Hutchins Jodka
The third comment was made by an unknown person from an IP address assigned to FedEx and was not traceable to any specific user. [read post]
2 Dec 2018, 7:49 am by Joel R. Brandes
Where the address of either party and any child or children is unknown and not a matter of public record, or is subject to an existing confidentiality order pursuant to DRL section 254 or FCA section 154-b, such applications may be brought in the county where the judgment was entered; and it is further(4) Additional Requirement with Respect to Uncontested and Contested Judgments of Divorce. [read post]
2 Dec 2018, 7:49 am by Joel R. Brandes
Where the address of either party and any child or children is unknown and not a matter of public record, or is subject to an existing confidentiality order pursuant to DRL section 254 or FCA section 154-b, such applications may be brought in the county where the judgment was entered; and it is further(4) Additional Requirement with Respect to Uncontested and Contested Judgments of Divorce. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
”Both the unknowns and knowns of the Miller case all point in the same troubling direction. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 3:32 pm by Eric
If, on the other hand, Plaintiff had some evidence that Defendants had a hand in creating the allegedly defamatory posts, it may have had a case. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 12:48 pm by Eugene Volokh
Plaintiffs' Motion has presented evidence that supports their contention that choosing not to become vaccinated can stigmatize an individual as uncaring for the well-being of others, especially in light of the many mutations that have been identified thus far and the unknowns surrounding protection through vaccination if the virus is not definitively stopped from spreading. [read post]
16 Aug 2009, 10:59 pm by Daniel Low
And, further, NAM desires to prevent Emmel from providing even greater detail --as Emmel was a former employee insider of almost 8 years at NAM—of alleged abhorrent NAM business practices and actions against its own customers and against competitors that has now entered the public record from emergence of discovery previously under seal, and now evidence coming into court proceedings and through trial testimony of Emmel and various other third parties at a recent trial that has… [read post]