Search for: "People v Clark"
Results 841 - 860
of 1,253
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Dec 2011, 1:22 am
Preston, R (on the application of) v Wandsworth Borough Council & Anor [2011] EWHC 3174 (Admin) (01 December 2011) December 1, 2011 High Court: Removal of voting rights for people who leave UK for over 15 years not contrary to EU freedom of movement law, although could in principle if rules “unjustifiably interfere with the freedom of movement”. [read post]
27 Nov 2011, 4:02 pm
“There already is a rather strong regulation against hacking people’s telephones – the law. [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 10:03 am
Senate v. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 4:05 pm
Senior people are above this childish, vain practice of peer review. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 6:03 pm
His citation of Clark v. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 1:21 pm
Clarke (D-N.Y.), Rep. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 7:21 am
Stephen Clark argues at the (Albany) Times Union that “the people challenging Obamacare’s individual mandate are asking the court to . . . [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 4:20 pm
The issue was dismissed by the Justice Secretary, Kenneth Clarke, who was not convinced a public interest defence is necessary to protect journalists who disobey the Bribery Act by paying for stories, Press Gazette reports. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 12:22 pm
In S.E.C. v. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 7:50 am
Richard Clark and Curtis Cusinato - Despite the uncertainty and volatility continuing to affect both the global economy and North American capital markets, controlled auction transactions in the Canadian marketplace remain remarkably active, especially in the mid-market. [read post]
12 Nov 2011, 5:33 am
For example, former Home Secretary Charles Clarke MP is said to have been watched for more than 20 days. [read post]
30 Oct 2011, 3:00 pm
The Law and Lawyers blog examines Ken Clarke’s recently announced amendments to the sentencing of offenders including the abolition of Indeterminate Public Protection (IPP) sentences (a passing not to be mourned in ObiterJ’s opinion) and the extension of mandatory life sentences. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 7:16 pm
The short of it is that under the Supreme Court's 1984 ruling in Clark v. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 3:16 pm
The Court issued its most recent opinion, People v. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 6:41 am
@legalbizzle on his blog writes:The Angry Pencil: a pathology of customer complaints “There are people who can’t let a bandwagon go unjumped on. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 8:12 am
I doubt many people would support such an effort once they understood the effect it would have on liberty. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 4:13 am
” FCC v. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 12:34 am
Downing Street has supported May and there is speculation that Clarke may lose his job in an upcoming cabinet reshuffle. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 12:34 am
Downing Street has supported May and there is speculation that Clarke may lose his job in an upcoming cabinet reshuffle. [read post]
