Search for: "People v. Henry"
Results 841 - 860
of 994
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jul 2023, 11:46 pm
The Bishop of Exeter, Henry Phillpotts, said in the debate in the House of Lords that the bill was “a disgrace to British legislation. [read post]
16 Jan 2021, 10:57 pm
”[44] If a letter of intent falls within the first or second category, courts generally do not consider it binding; but if it falls in the third or fourth category, courts generally consider it a binding contract.[45] For example, in Hunneman Real Estate Corp. v. [read post]
29 May 2014, 10:50 am
(Henry Knox and John Jay also sent Washington their ideas.) [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 7:01 pm
In Duncan v. [read post]
14 Jun 2022, 6:30 am
But Dinan focuses on something even more important about most of the states: With only one exception (Delaware), they reject what Madison was so proud of in Federalist 63, i.e., the removal from “we the people” of even an iota of an ability to engage in direct governance. [read post]
24 May 2012, 11:21 am
See, e.g., Oxendine v. [read post]
5 Apr 2007, 10:13 pm
[See James Lee Clark v. [read post]
5 Sep 2018, 5:32 pm
According to the Henry J. [read post]
5 Sep 2018, 5:32 pm
According to the Henry J. [read post]
4 May 2012, 3:13 am
Time assuredly will bring to light the policy strengths and weaknesses of using the individual mandate as part of this national legislation, allowing the peoples’ political representatives, rather than their judges, to have the primary say over its utility. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 8:31 am
The overwhelming result of all trials ends in a verdict of guilt for the accused and at that point another state official (bailiff, prison warden, parole officer, etc.) is obligated to apply the decision.[9] However, Dubber clarifies that the reference to the State in the style of cause is not thought to be a requirement for the publicness of a dispute.[10] He cites German cases that refer simply to the ‘Criminal Case against X’; a reference to ‘the… [read post]
4 Dec 2007, 7:06 pm
On Nov. 19, circuit judges Henry Lackey, Robert Elliott and Andrew Howorth all told the state Supreme Court they would "awate" the appointment of a special judge to take on the case, Jones v. [read post]
30 Jun 2019, 6:30 am
As I have argued elsewhere, it is one thing to repeat the injunction “let justice be done though the heavens fall,” even if one doubts that many people are really willing to adhere to the precept. [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 8:12 am
His previous book was “Henry Friendly, Greatest Judge of His Era” (Harvard University Press, 2012), which won Green Bag’s award for “exemplary legal writing. [read post]
26 Apr 2022, 4:22 am
Henry Foy reports for the Financial Times. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 11:00 am
Of the making of lists of books, there shall be no end. [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 3:00 am
Of the making of lists of books, there shall be no end. [read post]
11 May 2023, 9:00 pm
But that notion is inconsistent with the seminal compelled-speech case, Wooley v. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 1:39 pm
EPA is compelled to do so by the Clean Air Act, the Supreme Court's decision in Massachusetts v. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 9:44 pm
See Wallace v. [read post]
