Search for: "Re v. PERS" Results 841 - 860 of 7,383
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Dec 2018, 7:53 am by Wolfgang Demino
Also see ---> Private student loan collection suit not removable to federal court (addressing state vs. federal jurisdiction issue in context of original collection suit; sanctions imposed for improper removal in Richards v. [read post]
16 Nov 2013, 7:59 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
” In re Rosuvastatin Calcium Patent Litig., 703 F.3d 511, 519 (Fed. [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 8:18 am
• It was not, per se, contrary to public policy to allow a retrospective success fee. [read post]
28 Jul 2008, 9:55 am
Lindor, 2006 WL 3335048 (E.D.N.Y. 2006); In re Napster Inc., 2005 WL 1287611 (N.D. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 11:12 am by WIMS
One of the things that's always struck me about this project, we're looking at a maximum of $300 million that is invested, but when you look at the payback, per year, on a 50-year study on this, the state will be getting back $300 million a year on the assets that will be moving down this track, so it's a no brainer. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 11:58 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
” In re Wands, 858 F.2d 731, 736-37 (Fed. [read post]
7 Jun 2017, 11:57 am
So we’re here and ready to proceed with the trial, and I intend on going through with the trial. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 12:30 am
 The judge wielded a "broad axe" and assessed the loss of profits at £14.45 per unit x 1,755 units i.e. [read post]