Search for: "STATE v. HENNINGS"
Results 841 - 860
of 1,582
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Oct 2014, 2:10 am
This question was answered first when gaming was in its infancy, but still remains quite relevant in today's world of gaming and law.The case in question was Atari v North American Philips Consumer Electronics, decided by the United States Court of Appeals in 1982. [read post]
26 Oct 2014, 8:23 pm
Consideration of Hamdi v. [read post]
21 Oct 2014, 5:03 am
KG v Stokke A/S, Stokke Nederland BV, Peter Opsvik and Peter Opsvik A/S was decided on 18 September, but this Kat -- who has been beset by a succession of happy distractions -- has only just got round to writing it up for the weblog. [read post]
20 Oct 2014, 6:03 am
Katfriend Henning Grosse Ruse-Khan (University of Cambridge, King’s College and Max Planck Institute), kindly hosted by Eleonora, investigates those really questions in this post.* Galileo sees stars as ESA logo marches on Jeremy reports on the General Court of the European Union’s decision in Case T-450/11 Galileo International Technology LLC v OHIM, the European Commission and the European Space Agency (ESA). [read post]
20 Oct 2014, 4:30 am
State Bank v. [read post]
19 Oct 2014, 5:27 am
Henning Grosse Ruse-KhanWhat are the international investment law implications of the Unified Patent Court (UPC)? [read post]
17 Oct 2014, 9:38 am
Krull , 480 U.S. 340 (1987) (police conducted a search in reasonable reliance on subsequently invalidated state statutes); Arizona v. [read post]
17 Oct 2014, 8:04 am
Lensink controlled, the court stated that “[w]hen the state, by statute, waives its sovereign immunity to suit … the right to a jury trial cannot be implied, but rather, must be affirmatively expressed. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 7:57 am
Chism’s cert. petition asks “[w]hen the California Supreme Court conducts comparative review on appeal from the denial of a [Batson] motion … does its practice of seeking out reasons other than those stated by the prosecutor as a basis for the trial court’s ruling contravene [the Supreme] Court’s [precedent]? [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 9:57 am
” State v. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 9:26 am
Id. at *5 (citing Medtronic, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 2:48 pm
State of Missouri, et al. v. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 6:00 am
McBride v. [read post]
20 Sep 2014, 11:07 am
Parker v. [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 12:28 am
Aleykinov v. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 5:46 am
State v. [read post]
12 Sep 2014, 5:55 am
State v. [read post]
11 Sep 2014, 4:00 pm
Under the Supreme Court’s decision in Smith v. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 5:00 am
See Gupta v. [read post]
