Search for: "State v. Country"
Results 841 - 860
of 23,356
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jan 2025, 7:32 am
’ ” Chafin v. [read post]
24 May 2021, 8:27 am
The case, United States v. [read post]
13 Feb 2020, 6:39 am
In Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 1:51 pm
.; see Volkswagenwerk Aktiengesellschaft v. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 9:02 am
Michel V. [read post]
27 Apr 2007, 10:50 am
SENTENCING/PLEAUnited States v. [read post]
22 Aug 2008, 11:50 am
SENTENCINGUnited States v. [read post]
1 Apr 2020, 3:19 pm
United States (IHS; Treaty Rights)Leachman v. [read post]
12 Jan 2022, 1:42 pm
United States (Minor Offense in Indian Country; Criminal Jurisdiction) Federal Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/federal/2022.html Ute Indian Tribe of the Uintah and Ouray Reservation v. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 6:20 am
State, 714 P.2d 1176, 1180 (Wash. 1986) (en banc); Univ. of Minn. v. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 7:42 am
Americans along such roads all across the country are struggling economically. [read post]
19 May 2010, 8:53 am
The United States Supreme Court ruled that an order prohibiting the removal of a child from a country without the non-custodial parent's consent is enforceable under an international child abduction treaty, In Abbott v. [read post]
19 May 2010, 8:53 am
The United States Supreme Court ruled that an order prohibiting the removal of a child from a country without the non-custodial parent's consent is enforceable under an international child abduction treaty, In Abbott v. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 4:58 am
The Secretary of State disagreed. [read post]
15 May 2023, 6:00 am
For the first time since 1882, the Court judicially expanded the scope of state criminal jurisdiction in Indian country, finding that states hold jurisdiction over Indian-on-non-Indian crime concurrently with the federal government. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 1:37 pm
Indeed, it often must be, precisely to restrict officials from abusing the state’s monopoly on violence to bully citizens into serfdom. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 2:46 am
Addressing the testing concept of “very compelling reasons”, Lord Wilson also replicated the Strasbourg jurisprudence on deportation by focusing on factors such as (i) the depth of the deportee’s integration into the host society (ii) the quality of family relationships (iii) the extent of endurance of family relationships after deportation (iv) the need to safeguard and promote the welfare of any child (v) the strength of the obstacles to the deportee’s integration… [read post]
12 Feb 2014, 7:33 pm
” […] [I]n Learned v. [read post]
25 Feb 2018, 2:45 pm
The State sought pretrial detention, arguing that there was a serious risk that defendant would fail to appear in court, that he was a danger to the community, that he would intimidate the victim, her mother and other witnesses to obstruct justice, and that he was a flight risk because he had relatives living in another country. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 8:00 am
The fact is, the McDonald v. [read post]
