Search for: "State v. J. L. B." Results 841 - 860 of 2,362
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Dec 2017, 9:57 am by Wolfgang Demino
Similarly, the court held that the requirements of Rule 23(b)(2) (relief sought appropriate to class as a whole) and (b)(3) (common questions of law or fact predominate) were not satisfied "because there is no showing that the circumstances of each proposed class member are like those of Plaintiff, and because the resolution will turn on individual determinations as to cardholder agreements and assignments of debt. [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 9:09 am by Wolfgang Demino
In determining whether to grant leave to participate as an amicus,this Court has “broad discretion,” Nat’l Ass’n of Home Builders v. [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 9:09 am by Wolfgang Demino
In determining whether to grant leave to participate as an amicus,this Court has “broad discretion,” Nat’l Ass’n of Home Builders v. [read post]