Search for: "State v. Jacobs"
Results 841 - 860
of 1,969
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Mar 2008, 3:50 pm
By Eric Goldman Smith v. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 6:21 am
In United States v. [read post]
24 May 2013, 7:19 am
Jacobs of Greenwire reports that the ruling “could be a boon” for the Environmental Protection Agency. [read post]
29 May 2014, 5:16 am
In The Wall Street Journal, Jess Bravin covers the decision in Hall v. [read post]
12 Jul 2013, 4:41 pm
See 681 F. 3d, at 147 (Jacobs, C. [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 8:48 am
Finally, the newest member of the Court, Vice Chancellor Glasscock, discussed “poison pills” and in particular Chancellor Chandler’s February 15, 2011 decision in Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 4:43 am
Jacobs, and Jaclyn Belczyk of JURIST. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 5:06 am
An interesting article from Thomon Reuters News & Insight on an age-old problem in trade secrets, the fact that bringing suit often requires disclosing the trade secrets.The article concerns a case in New York state court, MSCI v. [read post]
11 Jun 2011, 6:54 am
He negotiated the deal in which the City of New York bought and renovated Yankee Stadium in 1971, when the team’s owners had threatened to leave and Mayor John V. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 5:24 am
The underlying case, Husain v. [read post]
19 Aug 2009, 10:24 pm
In Shomo v. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 7:17 am
Floyd LJ did note, though, that in many cases the fact that routine screening could be carried out will not be enough to render a patent obvious This case was distinguished from last summer’s judgment from Sir Robin Jacob in Teva v Leo Pharma ([2015] EWCA Civ 779), where Birss J’s decision on obviousness had been overturned, Floyd LJ stating in this case that the facts were very different. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 5:58 am
United States – which he describes as a “rare criminal case where the defendant is right” – and Sprint Communications v. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 6:09 am
Sir Robin Jacob, giving the leading judgment, stated that a wide view was intended in the construction of the disclosure as “a function of HMRC” and could extend to the function of “raising more tax revenue“. [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 3:40 am
Jacobs reports that, “[i]f coal companies get their way when the Supreme Court reviews U.S. [read post]
22 Nov 2021, 4:35 am
Last year, the Court in Manere v Collins reversed an order dismissing a minority member’s oppression-based claim for judicial dissolution on the ground that the lower court applied the incorrect legal standard. [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 5:41 am
The 2004 decision of the House of Lords in Campbell v Mirror Group Newspapers ([2004] 2 AC 457) was a significant case regarding privacy, and for human rights law and tort law more generally. [read post]
9 Apr 2022, 9:58 am
Anderson were joined by Molly Reynolds to discuss the week’s big national security news including alleged war crimes committed by Russian forces in Ukraine and Torres v. [read post]
2 Aug 2021, 10:28 am
But the constructive discharge claim is dismissed for good.The case is Byer v. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 7:26 am
He can sue under the Due Process Clause but not the ADA.The case is Heckman v. [read post]
