Search for: "State v. Mai" Results 841 - 860 of 133,185
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Aug 2024, 6:36 am
However, the standard for the two motions is the same: a complaint "'must state sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to 'state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face.'" Ashcroft v. [read post]
5 Aug 2024, 6:30 am by John Mikhail
  We have retained a right to recover our slaves in whatever part of America they may take refuge, which is a right we had not before. [read post]
5 Aug 2024, 6:02 am by Alyssa Yamamoto
And on the international stage, they have adopted counterterrorism rhetoric to mobilize support or deflect criticism – accusing other States of making statements “in support of terrorism,” urging supporters of the pending ICJ case (South Africa v. [read post]
5 Aug 2024, 2:41 am by Béligh Elbalti
Simply put, the so-called “presumptive reciprocity” means that, unless proven otherwise, reciprocity is presumed to exist between the requested State and the State of origin, to the extent permitted by domestic law of the requested State.[3] Here, “proven otherwise” refers to any existing case where the judgments from the requested State have been refused enforcement in the State of origin on the ground of the lack of reciprocity. [read post]
4 Aug 2024, 9:05 pm by Thomas A. Berry
In Loper Bright Enterprises v. [read post]
4 Aug 2024, 10:40 am by Giles Peaker
UO v London Borough of Redbridge (2024) EWHC 1989 (Admin) We first saw UO and Redbridge in this judicial review of an unlawful housing needs assessment (HNA) and suitability decision. [read post]
4 Aug 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
(This temptation may, admittedly, increase with one’s professional proximity to the social sciences.) [read post]
4 Aug 2024, 4:03 am by Annsley Merelle Ward
  On 9 July, Clark was appointed Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for AI and Digital Government at the Department for Science, Innovation and Technology. [read post]
3 Aug 2024, 11:52 pm by Frank Cranmer
The amendments, which are effective from 2 August 2024, prohibit prisoners subject to whole life orders from marrying or entering into civil partnerships unless they have permission from the Secretary of State (who may only give permission for a whole life prisoner to marry if satisfied that this is justified by exceptional circumstances). [read post]