Search for: "State v. Moore" Results 841 - 860 of 3,552
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Apr 2012, 8:03 am by Matthew Nelson
As stated earlier, the inability to define a mutually agreeable protocol is a key issue that has plagued the court and the parties for months in Da Silva Moore, et. al. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 1:43 am by sally
Supreme Court Stanford International Bank Ltd v Director of The Serious Fraud Office [2012] UKSC 3 (15 February 2012) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Cameron v Boggiano & Anor [2012] EWCA Civ 157 (21 February 2012) SS (Sri Lanka) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWCA Civ 155 (21 February 2012) Caterpillar Logistics Services (UK) Ltd v de Crean [2012] EWCA Civ 156 (21 February 2012) Hobson v Magee (t/a Team Magee) [2012]… [read post]
5 May 2014, 5:23 am
From last month’s New Hampshire Supreme Court decision in State v. [read post]
24 Feb 2007, 4:24 am
Moore              Eastern District of Michigan at  Detroit   SUMMARY JUDGMENT:  Claiming factual determinations by court in errorTORTS:  Defamation, public figure, and actual malice       07a0069p.06 2007/02/20 Bio-Ethical Reform v. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 2:26 am by Laura Sandwell
R (HS2 Action Alliance Ltd) v The Secretary of State for Transport & Anor, R (Heathrow Hub Limited & Anor) v The Secretary of State for Transport & Anor, and R (Buckinghamshire County Council & Ors) v The Secretary of State for Transport, heard 15 – 16 October 2013. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 3:49 am
Canceling COBRA coverageGeissal v Moore Medical Corp., USSC, 524 U.S. 74If an employer discovers that an individual participating in its health insurance plan under COBRA is also covered as a dependent under a different health insurance plan, may it cancel his or her coverage? [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 10:11 am by CJLF Staff
  Keri Blakinger of the Houston Chronicle reports that, in a 5-3 decision, the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals held that Moore "had failed to show adaptive deficits sufficient to support a diagnosis of intellectual disability"  Acknowledging the guidance the Supreme Court provided in Moore v. [read post]