Search for: "State v. Oxford" Results 841 - 860 of 1,744
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jun 2016, 5:30 pm by Schachtman
Rupp, Adjunct Instructor, School of Public and Environmental Affairs, and Senior Research Scientist, Indiana Geological Survey, Indiana University – Adam V. [read post]
25 Jun 2016, 7:03 am by Rishabh Bhandari
Isaac Park analyzed the Supreme Court’s ruling in RJR Nabisco, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
From SSRN:Debbie Kaminer, Religious Accommodation in the American Workplace: The Impact of the Supreme Court's Decision in EEOC v. [read post]
15 Jun 2016, 2:26 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Lord Neuberger and Lady Hale also stated that even if the court had been able to find the possession order disproportionate to her rights under art 8, the appellant could not assume that this would have led to the order being refused. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 1:29 pm by Sandy Levinson
  (If you won't believe me, then read Richard Posner's great opinion in Walker v. [read post]
6 Jun 2016, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Hospitality and United States Immigration Law, (Vincentian Heritage Journal: Vol. 33: Iss. 1, Article 8).Richard Moon, Neutrality and Prayers: Mouvement Laique v Saguenay, (Oxford Journal of Law and Religion, 2015, 4, 512–519).Stephen M. [read post]
21 May 2016, 1:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
Nevertheless, such a philosophy did not always coincide with conservative interests, as when Burger led the court in the unanimous decision United States v. [read post]
15 May 2016, 4:20 pm by INFORRM
The Oxford University Press blog has released an article discussing the Freedom of Information Act. suggesting that it is “here to stay”. [read post]
8 May 2016, 7:01 am
Upholding the constitutional validity of the Act, and following State of A.P. v. [read post]
2 May 2016, 2:00 pm by EEM
"Displaced: A Proposal for International Law to Protect Refugees, Migrants, and States," Berkeley Journal of International Law (Forthcoming, 2016) [eprint via SSRN] "Risk Assessment or Risk Avoidance? [read post]
22 Apr 2016, 12:18 pm
 This followed the line of authority excluding national law defences as illustrated by Case C-661/11 Martin y Paz Diffusion SA v Depuydt [2014] Bus LR 329 which stated that "...Consequently, save for the specific cases governed by article 8 et seq of that Directive, a national court may not, in a dispute relating to the exercise of the exclusive right conferred by a trade mark, limit that exclusive right in a manner which exceeds the limitations arising from articles… [read post]
3 Apr 2016, 4:23 pm by INFORRM
The three trials are as follows: 5 April 2016, Umeyor v Ibe, 5 days; 18 April 2016, Undre v London Borough of Harrow, 2 days.;  23 May 2016, Theedom v Nourish Training, 3-4 days. [read post]
3 Apr 2016, 12:30 am by Emily Prifogle
Williams discusses Defenders of the Unborn: The Pro-Life Movement Before Roe v. [read post]
28 Mar 2016, 4:50 pm by Kevin LaCroix
The court stated that the object of enactment of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 was to make the anti-corruption law more effective and widen its coverage. [read post]