Search for: "State v. Taylor "
Results 841 - 860
of 3,341
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jul 2019, 12:21 pm
With a new judge presiding, the military commission in United States v. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 9:56 pm
See United States v. [read post]
8 Jul 2019, 1:00 am
R v Reeves Taylor, heard 24-25 Jun 2019. [read post]
6 Jul 2019, 10:43 am
Buddy up with your friendly state public defender, and start fishing for transcripts of plea deals illustrating the broad use of Taylor-contested state statutes. [read post]
6 Jul 2019, 6:11 am
Margaret Taylor accepted responsibility for not identifying the now-suspended State Department protocol officer’s reported propensity for intimidating colleagues with a whip during the vetting process when she worked for the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. [read post]
3 Jul 2019, 6:56 am
State v. [read post]
2 Jul 2019, 1:04 pm
Vishnu Kannan shared the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit’s unredacted opinion in Doe v. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 1:00 am
R v Reeves Taylor, heard 24-25 Jun 2019. [read post]
30 Jun 2019, 4:07 pm
The full judgment of Andrew Hochauser QC in the data protection subject access case of Dawson-Damer v Taylor Wessing LLP [2019] EWHC 1258 (Ch) [pdf] handed down on 17 May 2019. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 6:32 am
Taylor v. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 10:30 am
United States. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 2:01 pm
"Beautiful use of historical citation by Justice Neil Gorsuch, writing for the plurality in United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 3:50 am
As stated in Taylor v. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 1:00 am
On Monday 24 and Tuesday 25 June, the Supreme Court will hear the appeal of R v Reeves Taylor. [read post]
19 Jun 2019, 8:19 am
* The State's Division of Criminal Justice Services [DCJS] is required by law to maintain a registry of all full-time and part-time police officers in the State and all agencies employing police officers are required to immediately report to DCJS when any officer it has employed ceases to so serve.Executive Law §837[13] authorizes DCJS to adopt such regulations "as may be necessary or convenient to the performance of its duties. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 2:18 pm
Two seminal events have occurred in recent days in the ongoing oversight war between the House of Representatives and the Trump administration—and in the ongoing expansion of the doctrine of executive privilege. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 11:59 am
” Under the Supreme Court’s 1990 decision in Taylor v. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 4:00 am
" Also, where necessary and appropriate, such disciplinary action may be conducted in absentia [see Mari v Safir, 291 AD2d 298]. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 4:05 pm
Stitt and Stokeling v. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 10:22 am
Way back in 1990, the Supreme Court decided Taylor v. [read post]