Search for: "State v. Toler"
Results 841 - 860
of 3,319
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Oct 2022, 6:20 pm
GUNDY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 9:15 am
Furthermore, now each prosecutor, defense attorney, and Municipal Court Judge must now re-do calculations to determine whether the results fit into the prescribed tolerance levels. [read post]
28 Nov 2007, 7:44 pm
On November 6, 2007, the California Supreme Court heard long-awaited arguments in the closely watched "medical marijuana" case of Ross v. [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 6:00 am
United States and Humphrey's Executor v. [read post]
22 Dec 2019, 10:26 am
However, it also emphasised that, even though the legalisation of cannabis for therapeutic and recreational purposes is under discussion across the EU, the consumption and use of cannabis containing THC above a stated threshold remains illegal in most EU Member States. [read post]
8 Jan 2014, 2:07 am
According to the Supreme Court, this approach is confirmed by the CJEU decision in the Budweiser case (Budějovický Budvar v Anheuser-Busch, case C-482/09), where the Court laid down that "the prerequisite for the running of [the period of limitation in consequence of acquiescence is], first, registration of the later trade mark in the Member State concerned". [read post]
1 May 2014, 5:45 am
Two years ago Judge Posner wrote an opinion in Apple v. [read post]
12 Mar 2016, 11:50 am
State, 659 So.2d 235, 238 (Florida Supreme Court 1995); Goudy v. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 11:17 am
Given the Court's astonishing and appalling creation of a constitutional right to lie about receiving a medal of valor in United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 2:32 pm
Showing no faith in the political process, as they exhibited yesterday in King v. [read post]
8 May 2013, 12:33 pm
(click here for a copy of the ruling Mondolo v. [read post]
23 Jul 2014, 4:00 am
______________A Reasonable Disciplinary Penalty Under the Circumstances - A 600+ page guide to penalties imposed on public employees in New York State found guilty of selected acts of misconduct. [read post]
1 Jul 2023, 4:44 am
Over at Balkinization, an interesting conversation is unfolding on the uses of history in Supreme Court decisionmaking, especially as pertains to the recent Haaland v. [read post]
26 Sep 2012, 5:58 am
Housing Authority v. [read post]
11 Feb 2013, 12:14 pm
Other states argue that not treating it the same will aggravate climate change over time. [read post]
5 Feb 2010, 5:30 am
In Tinker v. [read post]
20 Jan 2009, 3:18 pm
Well, folks, that kind of claim handling is why they own those big buildings in most downtown metropolitan cities.Ever since the 2003 decision in State Farm v Campbell, the courts have been restricting the availability of punitive damages as a deterrent to big business fraud, greed and just plain stupidity.What we said before about Dead Donkeys and Car Dealers (click here) is still true. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 7:27 am
See, e.g., Larry Catá Backer, Exposing the Perversions of Toleration: The Decriminalization of Private Sexual Conduct, the Model Penal Code, and the Oxymoron of Liberal Toleration, 45 Fla. [read post]
5 Mar 2008, 6:38 am
The bad news for the friends of federalism is that the 4-4 decision was likely the result of Chief Justice Roberts' recusal: It is difficult to believe that Roberts who joined Justice Scalia's dissenting opinion in Gonzales v Oregon, would tolerate state tort claims rooted in the allegation that a manufacturer committed fraud against the FDA. [read post]
10 Aug 2022, 5:01 am
U.S. v. [read post]
