Search for: "Stephens v. State Bar"
Results 841 - 860
of 1,674
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Dec 2015, 11:08 am
Three years ago, after California courts refused to enforce provisions in arbitration agreements that barred class arbitration (on the ground that the provisions were unconscionable), a closely divided court in AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 9:20 pm
She testified that she continues to maintain her New York State driver's license. [read post]
Argument analysis: Justices spar with counsel over excluding securities litigation from state courts
2 Dec 2015, 5:25 am
Twombly and Tellabs, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 3:21 am
Justice Bucaria based these rulings on the ancient principle of partnership law barring “piecemeal” adjudications among “squabbling” partners and requiring them, as stated by the Court of Appeals in Gramercy Equities Corp. v Dumont, 72 NY2d 560 [1988], either to “settle their own differences amicably or dissolve and finally conclude their affairs by a full accounting. [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 9:04 pm
Again, however, removal of any bar of immunity does not establish that Mr. [read post]
18 Nov 2015, 8:23 pm
Based on an error in a report by a news service, Religion Clause incorrectly reported last week that a California federal district court had issued a preliminary injunction barring the state of California from enforcing its recently enacted Reproductive FACT Act against two religiously affiliated pregnancy counseling centers. [read post]
14 Nov 2015, 8:39 pm
Mason v. [read post]
11 Nov 2015, 11:18 am
In State of Ohio v. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 7:29 am
Lawyers for both sides in yesterday’s argument in Shapiro v. [read post]
4 Nov 2015, 3:45 pm
” The state of the employee’s genitalia, the court pointed out, was irrelevant. [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 9:08 pm
A New York Family Lawyer said at issue on this appeal is whether the City of New York and a child protective service, defendant Louise Wise Services (LWS), sued herein as Louise Wise Agency, are insulated by immunity from liability for injuries allegedly sustained by children, both in connection with their judicial placement into the foster care system and subsequently, while in the custody of various foster homes. [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 1:16 pm
The Court had granted review of Foster v. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 7:25 am
The case is Dunn et al. v. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 10:30 am
” The two-step test The Second Circuit adopted the “two-step” Second Amendment test created by the 3rd Circuit in United States v. [read post]
20 Oct 2015, 8:46 pm
In United States v. [read post]
17 Oct 2015, 5:29 am
Opening up the language of Rule 702 to revision could result in reactionary change, driven by the tort bar’s and allies’ lobbying. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 6:06 am
Three years ago, after California courts refused to enforce provisions in arbitration agreements that barred class arbitration (on the ground that the provisions were unconscionable), a closely divided court in AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 6:00 am
A few years ago, American Bar Association President Stephen N. [read post]
24 Sep 2015, 5:42 am
State Bar of Arizona upheld a challenge by Arizona lawyers, John Bates (anyone watch Downtown Abbey?) [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 8:35 am
(Disclosure: I have filed an amicus brief on behalf of the American Bar Association in support of Hurst.) [read post]
