Search for: "Strong v. Strong"
Results 841 - 860
of 22,415
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Dec 2023, 4:00 am
”Citing the State’s “strong public policy” that disputes be heard “on the merits,” and given that she had demonstrated the existence of a “potentially meritorious defense” to the litigation, the AT1 thought that the court below had “providently exercised its discretion,” and left the outcome undisturbed.Apparently, the complaint made reference to unpaid rent due under a residential lease that had expired back on May 31, 2017, and… [read post]
27 Dec 2023, 9:40 am
” Our strong presumption flows from copyright law’s asymmetric recoveries. [read post]
27 Dec 2023, 5:25 am
Eastern District of North Carolina Judge Richard Myers in Nutt v. [read post]
27 Dec 2023, 5:00 am
In the case of Ritz v. [read post]
26 Dec 2023, 9:01 pm
It is more antidemocratic than putting an opposition politician on trial, because the voters who regard that trial as illegitimate are still allowed to vote for an indicted or convicted politician, as almost a million Americans did for Eugene V. [read post]
26 Dec 2023, 4:28 pm
Crandel v. [read post]
26 Dec 2023, 2:17 pm
Illinois v. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 12:30 pm
The nonprofit loses, though, because the state has a strong interest in preventing fraud. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 11:00 am
See Walsh v. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 6:38 am
Leytrick v. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 11:37 pm
” This tops my chart as one of the strong languages used by a conflict of laws’ academic to disagree with another academic. [read post]
The Office of Legal Counsel Discloses Classified List of Opinions in Important Step for Transparency
21 Dec 2023, 9:02 am
The case that led to the production of these documents, Francis v. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 6:00 am
This is a guest post by the Law Librarian of Congress, Aslihan Bulut. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 5:12 am
Its case for most of the claims is rather strong. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 2:18 pm
Jackson Women’s Health Organization, the 2022 case that overturned Roe v. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 4:00 am
"In Collins v. [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 12:55 pm
Thus, there was “a strong argument that the applicable law, where a consumer brings a product liability claim in respect of goods supplied in New Zealand, is New Zealand law” (at [78]), which included the Consumer Guarantees Act. [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 11:11 am
Mobil Oil Corp. v. [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 4:28 am
Lum met the plain language of three regulatory criteria, but it did not show that “she is strong in any of them. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 1:35 pm
Simpson Strong-Tie Co. v. [read post]
