Search for: "THE UNITED STATES et al" Results 841 - 860 of 8,480
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jan 2015, 8:35 am by Rich McHugh
By Rich McHugh In what perhaps can be best described as a win for traditional contract analysis, the United States Supreme Court (the “Court”) issued an opinion on January 25, 2015 in M&G Polymers USA, LLC, et al. v. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 10:43 am by Rich McHugh
By Rich McHugh In what perhaps can be best described as a win for traditional contract analysis, the United States Supreme Court (the “Court”) issued an opinion on January 25, 2015 in M&G Polymers USA, LLC, et al. v. [read post]
United States Department of Labor, et al., a judge in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas issued a nationwide preliminary injunction enjoining the United States Department of Labor (“DOL”) from implementing and enforcing the Fair Labor Standards Act (“the FLSA”) final overtime rule that would otherwise become effective on December 1, 2016. [read post]
United States Department of Labor, et al., a judge in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas issued a nationwide preliminary injunction enjoining the United States Department of Labor (“DOL”) from implementing and enforcing the Fair Labor Standards Act (“the FLSA”) final overtime rule that would otherwise become effective on December 1, 2016. [read post]
24 May 2012, 7:32 am by Wells Bennett
The latest statement from the defense in United States v. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 12:00 pm
., et al (11-11091), the Eleventh Circuit affirmed the district court's conclusion that the United States Treasury’s Home Affordable Mortgage Program (HAMP) program does not provide a private right of action. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 2:57 pm by Kathryn Briuglio
Ed. 2d 285 (1994). [5] See Brief for American Institute of Marine Underwriters et al.. as Amici Curiae. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 2:28 pm by PaulKostro
., et al., __ N.J. __ (2012), A-80-10, 066899, August 15, 2012: The proper analytical framework for testing the collateral estoppel effect of federal judgments is governed by reference to federal rather than to state law principles. [read post]