Search for: "Texas v. White" Results 841 - 860 of 2,000
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 May 2022, 4:30 am by Michael C. Dorf
Thus, even though Joe Blow wasn't a party to Texas v. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 10:09 am by R.J. MacReady
I suppose that both cases could be seen as searches that exceed the scope of the warrant, but then Dobbs doesn’t really need to address the issue of whether White v. [read post]
28 Jul 2016, 5:30 am
Obviously, if a candidate who does not support DAPA and DACA wins the White House, these programs will never see the light of day. [read post]
28 Jul 2016, 5:30 am
Obviously, if a candidate who does not support DAPA and DACA wins the White House, these programs will never see the light of day. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 7:36 am by Gritsforbreakfast
Over the weekend the New York Times ran a story by Adam Liptak previewing a US Supreme Court case ("Justices revisit rule requiring lab testimony," Dec. 19) called Briscoe v. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 5:51 am
 The 9th Circuit’s most famous right of publicity case is White v. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 6:33 am by Hans von Spakovsky
The Texas Attorney General’s announcement that the state will appeal a voter ID decision in Texas v. [read post]
19 Feb 2008, 4:38 pm
An Empirical (and Normative) Assessment of Scott v. [read post]
27 Dec 2017, 11:19 am by Wolfgang Demino
Keller on behalf of STATE OF TEXAS (Keller, Scott) (Entered: 11/28/2017)11/28/201711 MOTION for Leave to File Brief of Amici Curiae by STATE OF TEXAS, STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA, STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF ARKANSAS, STATE OF GEORGIA, STATE OF LOUISIANA, STATE OF OKLAHOMA, STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Proposed Brief of Texas et al., # 2 Text of Proposed Order)(Keller, Scott) Modified to add filers on 11/29/2017 (znmw). [read post]
27 Dec 2017, 11:19 am by Wolfgang Demino
Keller on behalf of STATE OF TEXAS (Keller, Scott) (Entered: 11/28/2017)11/28/201711 MOTION for Leave to File Brief of Amici Curiae by STATE OF TEXAS, STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA, STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF ARKANSAS, STATE OF GEORGIA, STATE OF LOUISIANA, STATE OF OKLAHOMA, STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Proposed Brief of Texas et al., # 2 Text of Proposed Order)(Keller, Scott) Modified to add filers on 11/29/2017 (znmw). [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
Law Div. 2005).Heeding presumptions are something that exists in some states (Massachusetts, Missouri, Oklahoma), doesn’t in others (California, Connecticut, Alabama), and is limited in still others (New, Jersey, Pennsylvania, Texas). [read post]