Search for: "Thomas v. Heard" Results 841 - 860 of 2,293
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Oct 2011, 1:46 am by INFORRM
Judgments The following reserved judgments after public hearings remain outstanding: WXY v Gewanter, heard 11-15, 18-19 July 2011 (Slade J) Commissioner of Police v Times Newspapers, heard 18-20 & 22 July 2011 (Tugendhat J) Morrison v Buckinghamshire CC, heard 20 to 21 July (HHJ Parkes QC) The Queen on the application of Guardian News and Media Limited -v- City of Westminster Magistrates’ Court heard 11 October 2011… [read post]
19 Apr 2020, 8:32 am by Eugene Volokh
Here's an excerpt from a 2016 Ninth Circuit oral argument in an employment discrimination case, Reynaga v. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 12:51 pm by Mark Walsh
The chief justice announces that Thomas has the opinion for the court in Davila v. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 6:38 am by Amanda Rice
At her Court Beat blog, Joan Biskupic discusses Snyder v. [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 8:22 am by Jonathan H. Adler
The term heard fewer cases than normal, and has resulved fewer than fifty cases thus far. [read post]
16 Aug 2006, 3:34 pm
Judge Rosalyn Higgins, President of the ICJ, At the 58th Session of the International Law Commission (25 July 2006) Cases currently being heard/under deliberation: Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Bosnia and Herzegovina v. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 1:02 am by INFORRM
Reserved Judgments Nagi v Sinniah Santhiramoulesan, heard 22 and 23 January 2024 (Collins Rice J) Sinton v Maybourne Hotels Limited, heard 19 and 20 December 2023 (Chamberlain J) Dyson v Channel 4, heard 15 December 2023 (HHJ Lewis) Pacini v Dow Jones, heard 13 December 2023 (HHJ Parkes KC) Amersi v BBC, heard 8 December 2023 (HHJ Lewis) Wilson v Mendelsohn and others,… [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 3:39 am by Edith Roberts
” Yesterday the court heard argument in McWilliams v. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 4:21 am by David Oscar Markus
”After a few questions from Thomas, the chief justice zeroes in on Mississippi’s 15-week ban. [read post]
22 Oct 2011, 3:35 pm by Jeff Gamso
There would have to be something really wrong for the Supreme Court to hear anything significantly new that was not heard before by the lower courts. [read post]