Search for: "Wells v. Smith" Results 841 - 860 of 4,913
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Feb 2020, 8:00 am by Gabriel Chin
In addition to evoking memories of a time when congressional relief for unauthorized migrants was more possible, United States v. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 8:23 pm by Donald Thompson
 Not until counsel has been “repeatedly unconscious through not insubstantial portions” of even capital murder trials will prejudice to the defendant will be presumed (see, Muniz v Smith, 647 F3d 619 [6th Cir 2011]; Burdine v Johnson, 262 F3d 336, 340-41 [5th Cir 2001]; Tippins v Walker, 77 F3d 682, 685 [2nd Cir 1996]). [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 1:05 pm
But this is also the rule in many other circuits as well. [read post]
2 Aug 2015, 4:01 pm
 Eleonora analyses the social network’s decision in light of EU and US’ originality criteria, as well as moral rights. [read post]
14 Apr 2007, 3:21 pm
The Supreme Court of Canada cited the 3rd edition in its decision in Buschau v. [read post]
23 Dec 2020, 5:31 am by Annsley Merelle Ward
In his judgment, Birss J provided that the requirements to plead commercial success are well known (i.e. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 3:20 pm by Eugene Volokh
(Eugene Volokh) Michael Smith and I have just filed an amicus brief that I drafted for Arming Women Against Rape & Endangerment (AWARE) in the Michigan Second Amendment stun gun case, People v. [read post]
25 Jun 2021, 4:53 pm by INFORRM
  In the well known case of Stocker v Stocker, although the case failed on meaning it was accepted that publication had been proved on the basis that the message was visible to the 110 Facebook friends of the person to whom it was addressed. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 4:31 pm by INFORRM
” As Warby J said in Doyle v Smith [2018] EWHC 2935 (QB) – “This is a beguilingly simple sentence. [read post]