Search for: "Williams v. Chicago"
Results 841 - 860
of 1,081
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jun 2010, 8:37 am
Best Buy “Price Match” Refusal Would Be Consumer FraudThis posting was written by William Zale, Editor of CCH Advertising Law Guide.A Best Buy customer stated plausible claims that the retailer violated the Illinois Consumer Fraud Act and engaged in unjust enrichment by failing to honor its advertised “price match guarantee,” the federal district court in Chicago has ruled.In a class action complaint, the customer alleged that he purchased a 42-inch… [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 7:11 am
Meanwhile, Ben Conery of the Washington Times, Pete Williams of MSNBC, and the AP all cover Monday’s denial of cert. in Rodearmel v. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 10:04 am
Click Here US District Court Decision in US v. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 9:54 am
Click Here US District Court Decision in US v. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 6:52 am
(d) Byrd v. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 8:16 am
“In addition to crossing the barrier from the defense side to the plaintiff side, he’s firmly committed himself on the side of nonpracticing entity, which is attracting attention,” William F. [read post]
30 May 2010, 3:55 pm
City of Chicago now links to the decision and to analysis by Akin Gump’s Carl Cecere, while the case page for Robertson v. [read post]
28 May 2010, 2:28 pm
To his credit, President Gerald Ford five years later also looked past many individuals who were mentioned or actively lobbying to succeed Justice William O. [read post]
28 May 2010, 4:23 am
related to William S. [read post]
26 May 2010, 6:46 am
In her report on American Needle Inc. v. [read post]
13 May 2010, 12:15 pm
In Marino v. [read post]
11 May 2010, 7:30 pm
Turning away from the rapidly growing body of commentary on Kagan’s time at Harvard Law School and in Washington, the Huffington Post has a piece on the years she spent in Chicago. [read post]
10 May 2010, 2:52 pm
Powell, Jr., Chief Justice William H. [read post]
10 May 2010, 4:44 am
While at Williams & Connolly, Ms. [read post]
7 May 2010, 10:00 pm
The Chicago paper builds on the arguments she made in two earlier papers on the Supreme Court’s 1992 decision in R.A.V. v. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 5:28 am
So for Chapman v. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 11:44 am
Chicago, has its own with overlapping issues. [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 6:39 am
Looking forward, the New York Times reports on next week’s upcoming argument in Monsanto Co. v. [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 6:31 am
(Chicago Tribune, L.A. [read post]
