Search for: "Wood v. United States"
Results 841 - 860
of 1,240
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Sep 2014, 10:06 am
The common law, as it developed in the United States from the early 19th century, was hospitable to apportionments that avoided “entire” or “joint and several” liability. [read post]
15 Aug 2024, 6:00 am
The book argues that the binary state-versus-federal-government model that is today taken to be the essence of American federalism does not correspond to the legal or political reality of the United States in the early nineteenth century. [read post]
25 Jul 2014, 9:33 am
"The IPKat will continue to monitor the situation, rather suspecting that trade mark expert, American sports-lover and blog team member Neil will feel tempted to write something on it when the moment is ripe.Another curiosity from the United States may be perused in this Daily Mail article, "New Jersey sues Florida pizza shop 1,300 miles away because logo is 'too similar' to Garden State Parkway", via a tip-off from Chris… [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 12:15 pm
Hobby Lobby Stores (13-354) and Conestoga Wood Specialties Corp. v. [read post]
26 Aug 2021, 5:00 am
Those of us in the United States, Liberia, and Myanmar would like an answer too, please. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 11:17 am
SAYS, United States v. [read post]
15 Nov 2006, 8:00 am
United States - see S2KM's Murphy wiki Arkansas DHS v. [read post]
26 Feb 2006, 8:17 am
., said his state's many fees, known there as add-ons, were a backdoor way to make poor people pay for the free lawyers guaranteed to them by the United States Supreme Court's decision in Gideon v. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 2:37 pm
(United States v. [read post]
18 May 2012, 6:57 pm
United Food & Commercial Workers Union Local 342, 246 Fed.Appx. 7 (2d Cir.2007) (same). [read post]
19 Jul 2018, 12:12 pm
The law permits a president to “deal with any unusual and extraordinary threat, which has its source in whole or substantial part outside the United States, to the national security, foreign policy, or economy of the United States,” if he first declares a national emergency under the National Emergencies Act (NEA). [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 12:01 pm
Loewy’s article United States v. [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 10:22 am
State-on-top habeas case Woods v. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 11:47 am
United States, 377 U.S. 201 (1964). [read post]
2 Apr 2008, 8:14 pm
Amarante, DAI v. [read post]
15 Jan 2010, 10:26 am
States are barred by a Supreme Court precedent, Massachusetts v. [read post]
21 Sep 2012, 5:47 am
These two counts charged Laiwala with violating California Penal Code § 115(a), which provides as follows:Every person who knowingly procures or offers any false or forged instrument to be filed, registered, or recorded in any public office within this state, which instrument, if genuine, might be filed, registered, or recorded under any law of this state or of the United States, is guilty of a felony.People v. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 3:58 am
” At the Federalist Society Review, Jonathan Wood and Ilya Shapiro weigh in on Christie v. [read post]
29 Jul 2017, 9:56 am
Wood Cty. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 7:00 am
Margaret Wood, Senior Legal Research Specialist – Margaret chose Bradshaw v. [read post]
