Search for: "Works v. State" Results 841 - 860 of 61,590
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jul 2022, 10:53 am by HRWatchdog
Court Ruling This issue was discussed in the California Supreme Court case of Sullivan v. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 3:00 am by Robert Kreisman
Village of Lincolnshire, 905 F.3d 995 (7th Cir. 2018), which allowed states to pass right-to-work legislation under the National Labor Relations Act. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 3:25 pm by Eugene Volokh
(Eugene Volokh) I’m working on an amicus brief in the Supreme Court’s Stolen Valor Act case (United States v. [read post]
5 Mar 2021, 12:43 am by CMS
On 25 February 2021, the UK Supreme Court heard the appeal in Anwar v The Advocate General (Representing the Secretary of State for Business Energy and Industrial Strategy). [read post]
22 Aug 2018, 3:30 am by Eric B. Meyer
” (Although, one Western District of Pennsylvania judge concluded that the Third Circuit’s decision in Bibby v. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 6:08 pm by Lawrence Solum
As chief justice of the United States, Chase is chiefly remembered for his nationalistic opinion in Texas v. [read post]
Working closely with our lobbyists in state capitols around the country, we’ve been tracking this activity and working hard to make sure these privacy-protective bills become law. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 9:55 am by Eric M. Gold
A little over two months ago, we analyzed the recent decision in Black & Veatch Corp. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 1:04 pm by Mike Madison
Itar-Tass Russian News Agency v. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 10:08 am
"The principal question presented in this appeal is whether the first sale doctrine applies to copyrighted works produced outside of the United States but imported and resold in the United States. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 6:00 am by Trevor Cutaiar
  The court noted that the Fifth Circuit has clearly stated that “spars are not vessels but rather are work-platforms. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:59 am by ASAD KHAN
However, art 51 limits the CFR’s application to “only when” member states “are implementing Union Law”. [read post]