Search for: "CO.1. Means" Results 8581 - 8600 of 16,767
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 May 2015, 9:18 am by John Elwood
Campbell-Ewald Co. v. [read post]
8 May 2015, 5:25 am
 Over to Daniel:This Kat bears belated news of the most recent episode in the IPCom saga in the form of a decision from the Patents Court decision, handed down on 24 April 2015, in IPCom v HTC [IPCOM GmbH & Co Kg v HTC Europe Co Ltd & Ors [2015] EWHC 1034 (Pat) (24 April 2015)].The decision relates to the European Patent (UK) 1 841 268 belonging to IPCom; a divisional of the patent EP 1 186 189. [read post]
In this column, we focus not on any particular state statute but rather on three general topics: (1) the purpose of the earliest state RFRA laws and how that purpose relates to the goals of the more recently enacted and proposed legislation; (2) the virtues (and drawbacks) of enacting a general religious liberty statute as opposed to adopting religion specific accommodations on a case-by-case basis; and (3) the best way, in light of the current controversy about the conflict between state… [read post]
7 May 2015, 4:00 am by Eric B. Meyer
This case is not one of the rare instances where overwhelming extrinsic evidence demonstrates a legislative intent contrary to the text’s plain meaning. [read post]
5 May 2015, 12:01 pm
At trial, the prosecutor used the fact that Davis’s cell phone had placed/received calls from co-conspirators at the time of the robberies in the area around the victimized stores to indicate that he was one of the robbers. [read post]
5 May 2015, 7:26 am by Adrian Miedema
The company owner was charged with and convicted of the Occupational Health and Safety Act offences of (1) knowingly furnishing an inspector with false information or neglecting or refusing to furnish information required by an inspector, and (2) failing to furnish all necessary means in the person’s power to facilitate any entry, search, inspection, investigation, examination, testing or inquiry by an inspector. [read post]
5 May 2015, 7:26 am by Adrian Miedema
The company owner was charged with and convicted of the Occupational Health and Safety Act offences of (1) knowingly furnishing an inspector with false information or neglecting or refusing to furnish information required by an inspector, and (2) failing to furnish all necessary means in the person’s power to facilitate any entry, search, inspection, investigation, examination, testing or inquiry by an inspector. [read post]
4 May 2015, 2:15 pm by Jonathan Brun
The use of safety quotes, when handled effectively, can mean lower DART ratings for your company. [read post]
4 May 2015, 10:18 am by Robert D. Durham
In Consolidated Edison Co. of New York v. [read post]
4 May 2015, 6:33 am by Marc Patterson
  Presumably, the reference to this webinar being the “final” webinar is intended to mean that it is the final TRID webinar before the rule becomes effective on August 1, 2015. [read post]
4 May 2015, 6:00 am by JB
Madison, which held that the Supreme Court is the supreme interpreter of everything in the Constitution and can determine what it means and change it over time. [read post]