Search for: "Does 1 - 23" Results 8581 - 8600 of 15,450
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Nov 2014, 8:29 am by The Rotolo Law Firm
The “AARP Bulletin” cited data showing that after divorce the average income for a man drops about 23% and for a woman by about 41%. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 9:15 am by Maureen Johnston
Hurles 14-191Issue: (1) Whether, under this Court's decision in Martinez v. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 2:06 pm by Michael Cannon
Burwell, “Taxation Without Representation: The Illegal IRS Rule to Expand Tax Credits Under the PPACA,” Health Matrix: Journal of Law-Medicine 23, No. 1 (2013): 119-195. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 11:26 am by Steven Koprince
 Accounting for weekends, Axxon’s initial response deadline was July 23. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 10:31 am by Joseph J. Lazzarotti
This so-called “Online Eraser Law” – signed by Governor Jerry Brown on September 23, 2013 – will take effect on January 1, 2015. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 4:41 pm by Jared Beck
Meanwhile, 23 states already have laws on the books permitting the use of cannabis as a medicine. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 4:41 pm by Jared Beck
Meanwhile, 23 states already have laws on the books permitting the use of cannabis as a medicine. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 8:42 am by Jonathan Bailey
Choyce responded by filing a lawsuit against the doe defendants as well as ISPs and others involved in running the sites. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 10:49 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
’”Phillips, 415 F.3d at 1322–23 (quoting VitronicsCorp. v. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 4:36 am
The result (at para 198) is this:"We have ... come to the conclusion that the appeal must be allowed and the case remitted to the High Court for retrial of the claims for infringement under Article 5(1)(a) of the Directive (as implemented in section 10(1) of the Trade Marks Act 1994) and Article 9(1)(a) of the Regulation".The court also had some harsh words for the doctrine of initial interest confusion, describing it as "unnecessary" and… [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 1:10 am by Andrew Trask
  Absent class members are the beneficiaries of Rule 23. [read post]