Search for: "English v. English"
Results 8581 - 8600
of 11,204
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Apr 2011, 9:32 pm
United States v. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 9:32 pm
The court found their conduct is covered under the plain English meaning of intent to evade by traveling low in the water in a vessel painted ocean blue without headlights or signals. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 3:25 pm
The case was Cullen v. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 1:00 pm
ARTICLE V Extradition shall not be granted in any of the following circumstances: 1. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 9:02 am
Michel V. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 5:10 am
Conclusion In Slim v Daily Telegraph Ltd Lord Diplock referred to “the artificial and archaic character of the tort of libel” ([1968] 2 QB 157, 171). [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 2:08 am
-- but not into English. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 1:17 am
Neuberger takes a traditional English constitutional line on this issue. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 5:53 pm
In relation to the harassment claim, the Court adopted the summary of the law from the English case of Dowson v Chief Constable of Northumbria ([2010] EWHC 2612 [142]). [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 1:00 pm
Article V describes the bases for the non-discretionary denial of extradition. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 9:00 am
ARTICLE V (1) Extradition shall not be granted if: (a) the person sought would, if proceeded against in the territory of the requested Party for the offense for which his extradition is requested, be entitled to be discharged on the grounds of a previous acquittal or conviction in the territory of the requesting or requested Party or of a third State; or (b) the prosecution for the offense for which extradition is requested has become barred by lapse of time according to the law of the… [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 5:51 pm
In those cases, a claimant would only be permitted to bring a claim in the English courts if this is “clearly the most appropriate place” in which to bring such a claim. [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 6:48 am
Le Roux and others v Dey (South African Constitutional Court) [2011] ZACC 4 With the new libel reform proposals doing the consultation rounds it is enlightening to see how other jurisdictions strike the balance privacy and dignity on the one hand, and freedom of expression on the other. [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 1:28 am
The case of Tryggingarfelagio Foroyar P/F v CPT Empresas Maritimas S.A. [2011] EWHC 589 (Admlty) concerned whether the agreement between the claimant's insured and the defendant was subject to a set of standard terms which incorporated an English arbitration clause. [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 1:05 am
In the latest case, reported as Folgate London Market Limited (formerly Towergate Stafford Knight Co Limited) v Chaucer Insurance PLC [2011] EWCA Civ 328, an insurance broker had agreed to indemnify a company against liability in respect of a personal injury claim where the insurers had declined cover on the basis of an exception in the policy. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 8:32 am
Thanks to one of the members in the Linkedin International Arbitration group, this blawgger was able to get hold of the decision of the Court of Appeal of Paris in Dallah Real Estate and Tourism Holding Co. v. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 10:00 pm
The decision of the Supreme Court in Jones v Kaney (see earlier post by Rosalind English) removes the immunity previously enjoyed by those who have acted as experts from suit by their former clients. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 8:08 pm
McCloskey is a professor of economics, history, English, and communication, at the University of Illinois (Chicago). [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 5:34 pm
English PEN and Index on Censorship complain that “defendants have to jump through too many hoops for their publication to qualify as ‘comment’, while judges tend to be overly analytical in their approach”. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 9:01 am
But even defective warrants can pass constitutional muster.The case is U.S. v. [read post]
