Search for: "In Re Doe I" Results 8581 - 8600 of 70,558
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jan 2007, 1:18 pm
Are either conventional or open access journals likely to deliver what they're being paid for? [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 3:19 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Cir. 1989); In re Lukach, 58 C.C.P.A. 1233, 442 F.2d 967, 968-70 (C.C.P.A. 1971); see In re DiLeone,436 F.2d 1033, 1034 (C.C.P.A. 1971) (DiLeone I) (affirming rejection of claim encompassing broad chemical class, where specification described only a species); In re Ahlbrecht, 58 C.C.P.A. 848, 435 F.2d 908, 910-12 (C.C.P.A. 1971) (affirming rejection of ? [read post]
3 Aug 2013, 8:55 am
It’s hard work, and it does lead to some conflict — that tension I talked about — but it’s creative. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 6:00 am by Steve Baird
Today, we’re speaking about this important tool that should be found in any trademark practitioner’s tool box, and in case you’re not able to attend, here is a table I put together that helps me consider which tool works in which context: What do you think? [read post]
28 Aug 2009, 9:33 am
" I know what you're thinking; personal injury is not exactly in my wheelhouse. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 9:42 am
Does anyone know how Obamacare is funded? [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 8:49 am by Ed Felten
At no point in this process does JD tell anybody who he is -- I called him "John Doe" for a reason. [read post]
15 Mar 2022, 5:42 pm by freddy
Our Picacho injury accident attorneys fully invest in our injured clients and work to get them the compensation to which they’re entitled. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 9:33 am
Therefore, we vacate the sentence imposed by the district court and remand for re-sentencing [read post]
28 Apr 2018, 9:49 am by Shawn R. Dominy
The government could easily re-write the rules if it didn’t really mean “witness”. [read post]
28 Apr 2018, 9:49 am by Shawn R. Dominy
The government could easily re-write the rules if it didn’t really mean “witness”. [read post]
6 Apr 2021, 5:00 pm
Does an ethic that regards a fetus as an abnormal growth of tissue really serve? [read post]