Search for: "United States v. Burden"
Results 8581 - 8600
of 9,848
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jun 2015, 1:29 pm
Notwithstanding, that claim fails for the simple reason that the United States Supreme Court has held that design defect claims involving pharmaceutical products are preempted. [read post]
22 Jul 2016, 11:30 am
Edward Ryan, an attorney for the United States, then informs Judge Pohl that he is prepared to respond, but asks for a moment with the Chief Prosecutor and co-trial counselor. [read post]
5 Feb 2019, 6:03 am
On Jan. 28 and 29, the military commission in United States v. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 2:21 pm
In distinguishing Windisman[28], Winkler J. had stated that in Sutherland the work of the RP was unnecessary to the preparation or presentation of the case. [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 5:17 pm
Salazar, No. 07-40683 Conviction and sentence for witness tampering are affirmed where: 1) conviction was based on sufficient evidence; 2) an objection to the application of a cross-reference to a sentencing guideline was waived; 3) the penalty provisions of the witness-tampering statute were correctly applied; and 4) the proper burden of proof was applied in determining sentence enhancements. . [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 5:38 pm
The Court, in Chamber of Commerce of the United States v. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 9:01 pm
The problem for the states in these cases is that if their only reason to ban same-sex marriage is religious, the bans are unconstitutional under Lemon v. [read post]
12 May 2023, 11:45 am
In which geographic area must the consensus exist (California, or the United States, or the world)? [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
– ‘Rioja’ GI survives (Class 46) Suriname Impersonator acquitted of attempting to deceive paying customers into thinking she is the true Toni Braxton (1709 Copyright Blog) Switzerland Some data on 3D trademarks in Switzerland (Class 46) Shapes that made it, and those that didn’t (Class 46) United Kingdom EWHC: Revocation proceedings not an abuse of process even if not commercially justified: TNS Group Holdings Ltd… [read post]
15 Aug 2016, 8:07 am
Villalpando v. [read post]
18 Feb 2012, 5:15 am
Boston Scientific Corp., 433 F.3d 1, 5 (1st Cir. 2006)(holding that SOX has no application to employees outside the United States). [read post]
8 May 2017, 9:01 pm
”Rizo v. [read post]
5 May 2015, 3:26 pm
See Ware v. [read post]
5 May 2015, 3:26 pm
See Ware v. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 2:14 pm
An earlier Ninth Circuit decision in the case discussed how Teck’s smelter had dumped slag waste into the Columbia River, ten miles north of the border, over several decades of operation, which resulted in pollution downstream in the United States. [read post]
19 Nov 2023, 2:37 am
The biggest legal news of the week was almost certainly the judgment of the Supreme Court in R (AAA (Syria) & Ors) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2023] UKSC 42, in which the Court held unanimously that the Secretary of State’s policy of sending asylum-seekers to Rwanda was unlawful. [read post]
5 Sep 2021, 6:23 am
The de novo standard of review is the “default” national standard, and it has been since 1989, when the United States Supreme Court held (in Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 5:02 pm
In Thibodeaux v. [read post]
19 Nov 2023, 1:07 am
The biggest legal news of the week was almost certainly the judgment of the Supreme Court in R (AAA (Syria) & Ors) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2023] UKSC 42, in which the Court held unanimously that the Secretary of State’s policy of sending asylum-seekers to Rwanda was unlawful. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 5:02 pm
In Thibodeaux v. [read post]
