Search for: "In Interest of C."
Results 8601 - 8620
of 42,093
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Aug 2011, 6:38 am
Via the (new) legal writer blog, the following is a an interesting post about how many spaces should follow a period. [read post]
18 May 2011, 5:13 am
Meanwhile, there's been some interesting nuke news closer to home. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 11:22 pm
Through this network of college, technical institute and university student governments, CASA represents and defends the interests of approximately 320,000 post-secondary students to the federal government. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 10:50 pm
In California, there are very different tax consequences for C corporations, S corporations, partnerships and limited liability companies. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 9:44 am
Although traditional hydropower has not seen significant new development in recent years, interest in small, low-impact projects is on the rise across the country. [read post]
21 Feb 2008, 1:45 pm
., owner of a billboard leasehold interest, the trial court entered an order of appropriation, and the appointed appraisers concluded that Universal sustained damages of $243,800 from the appropriation. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 5:30 pm
Before taking a look at the Top 10 posts from today, a couple quick LXBN-related links: first up, Zosha has a really interesting piece today on how artificial intelligence could impact lawyers; and, Rich Beem joins me on LXBN TV to discuss the big patent infringement ruling against Apple. [read post]
28 Nov 2009, 4:41 am
C. [read post]
22 Mar 2013, 9:24 am
London Borough of Islington v The Unite Group Plc [2013] EWHC 508 (Admin)This is an interesting appeal in relation to the counting of storeys for HMO licensing purposes. [read post]
22 Mar 2013, 9:24 am
London Borough of Islington v The Unite Group Plc [2013] EWHC 508 (Admin)This is an interesting appeal in relation to the counting of storeys for HMO licensing purposes. [read post]
15 Jan 2020, 4:00 am
UAlberta Pro-Life v Governors of the University of Alberta, 2020 ABCA 1 (CanLII) [147] The reference to the Alberta Human Rights Act is interesting. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 8:28 am
Michael C. [read post]
15 Jul 2021, 5:01 am
Congress can't say to a platform, "so long as any of your actions are immune under § 230(c)(1), you must accept restrictions on all your First-Amendment-protected activities, even if those don't take advantage of the immunity": That would be unconstitutionally "leverag[ing] funding to regulate speech outside the contours of the program. [read post]
1 Jan 2010, 7:18 pm
C. [read post]
6 May 2023, 1:03 am
The rejection of a threshold of seriousness is of interest, and the CJEU has long emphasised the deliberately wide reach of the GDPR. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 11:30 am
., C 08-05780 JW (N.D. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 1:11 am
The Court of Justice of the European Union has given its decision in the Painer case (Case C-145/10). [read post]
14 Sep 2007, 8:17 am
LEXIS 333 (September 10, 2007): Where the privacy interests implicated by the search are minimal, and where an important non-criminal governmental interest furthered by the intrusion would be placed in jeopardy by a requirement of individualized suspicion, a search may be reasonable despite the absence of such suspicion. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 10:29 pm
Moreover, the defendant did not, and has not since, claimed any privacy, possessory, or ownership interest in the handgun. [read post]
27 Oct 2020, 6:28 am
If you know someone who might be interested in participating, please pass this opportunity on to them. [read post]
