Search for: "Short v. United States" Results 8601 - 8620 of 10,137
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jun 2010, 6:00 pm by Erin Miller
United States (09-636): originally conference of 3.5.10 Juvenile Male v. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 4:29 pm by Trey Childress
Today, the United States Supreme Court released its decision in Samantar v. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 1:58 pm by Leslie Sammis
Thompkins, the United States Supreme Court ruled 5-4 that a suspect has to speak the "magic words" in order to actually assert the right to remain silent. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 1:09 pm
United States Plywood Corp., 318 F. [read post]
28 May 2010, 7:16 am by Erin Miller
Briefly: At Concurring Opinions, Robert Schapiro comments on the potential implications that the Court’s recent decision in United States v. [read post]
26 May 2010, 10:16 pm by Rosalind English
At the time the Convention was crafted, it could not have been envisaged that Article 3 (and Article 8, in its train) would ultimately entail an obligation on signatory states to protect individuals from actions taken by, or within the territory of, non signatory states – the so called “extra-territorial effect” created by various rulings of the Strasbourg Court, most notably Chahal v United Kingdom. [read post]
26 May 2010, 6:46 am by Adam Chandler
” The New York Law Journal analyzes the Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
25 May 2010, 2:00 pm by Steve Vladeck
., I'm scheduled to testify at a hearing before the Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, and Homeland Security of the House Committee on the Judiciary, on the implications of the Supreme Court's decision in last month in United States v. [read post]
24 May 2010, 11:11 am by Marvin Ammori
” Sometimes, she even seems to caricature these arguments—which is unusual for her, as her scholarship is generally remarkably nuanced (and brilliant).In terms of sources, I will discuss primarily a short passage in Kagan’s first article and Kagan’s argument in Citizens United, as well as their relation to the longer passage in Kagan’s scholarship that I discussed in my previous post. [read post]
21 May 2010, 12:16 pm by Robert Oszakiewski
However, the areas covered by the review would be greatly reduced from (1) an evaluation of the technical accomplishments of the Program, including a review of whether the Program has achieved the goals under the metrics established by the Council; (2) a review of the Program’s management and coordination across agencies and disciplines; (3) a review of the funding levels at each agency for the Program’s activities and the ability of each agency to achieve the Program’s… [read post]