Search for: "State v. First Judicial District Court"
Results 8601 - 8620
of 9,094
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jul 2015, 8:01 am
Rule 16(a)(6) is a catchall clause that requires the government to “[a]dvise the defendant’s attorney of evidence favorable to the defendant and material to the defendant’s guilt or punishment to which defendant is entitled pursuant to Brady and United States v. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 10:19 am
District Court for the Northern District of Texas ruled in its 2013 decision in the case of Crane v. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 4:30 am
Juries in defamation trials got the thumbs up from the NSW Court of Appeal after a clumsy attempt by District Court Judge Len Levy to get rid of them. [read post]
1 May 2023, 8:55 pm
McGlynn of the Southern District of Illinois, in Barnett v. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 11:11 am
Before asking stakeholders whether and how this phrase should be defined, however, it seems to me that OPR should first thoroughly analyze CEQA’s legislative history to determine whether the Legislature ever intended it to broadly apply to non-state agency projects in the first place. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 7:42 am
DECISIONS Sackett v. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 8:03 am
Civil Action No. 09-1931 (RMU), No. 12., 13 United States District Court, District of Columbia. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 6:44 pm
The court, in United States v. [read post]
13 Dec 2009, 6:46 pm
Knotts, 460 U.S. 276 (1983), and United States v. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 1:21 pm
State v. [read post]
31 Aug 2021, 11:58 am
In Jance v. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 4:20 pm
The courts have decided that no claim in nuisance lies against a sewerage undertaker for lack of capacity in its sewers (Marcic v. [read post]
14 Jul 2012, 7:08 am
United States v. [read post]
12 Mar 2023, 9:31 am
First, the photos showed they were outside the city's security secretariat building. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 10:35 am
Famously, Judge Janis Jack of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas addressed these issues in a lengthy decision in which she excoriated physicians, medical screeners, and plaintiffs’ lawyers who she concluded had transgressed basic ground rules of medical and legal propriety in connection with silicosis claims.[2] The stakes generated by the availability of these medical/technical opinions are especially high in mass… [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 6:07 pm
Diaz v. [read post]
23 Jun 2024, 9:02 pm
Cohn, a brilliant, corrupt attorney, first made his name as a prosecutor in the infamous Cold War espionage case, United States v. [read post]
24 Dec 2008, 3:57 pm
’ Similarly, the District Court decision in In re De Puy, 7 F. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 10:46 am
Wallace (1939), and United States v. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 8:08 am
Pinkney v. [read post]
