Search for: "State v. First Judicial District Court"
Results 8601 - 8620
of 9,094
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jul 2008, 11:57 pm
More recent decisions (District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 4:16 am
Despite the Supreme Court's 1976 ruling in Gregg v. [read post]
8 Jul 2008, 7:03 pm
Instead, the court of appeals relied on the Court's decision in United States v. [read post]
8 Jul 2008, 12:14 pm
The district court denied the motion. [read post]
8 Jul 2008, 6:00 am
Raising the Standard (of Review) Beyond applicability to the states or not, the standard of review is uncertain for laws that differ from the District of Columbia handgun ban that was nullified. [read post]
8 Jul 2008, 1:30 am
First, we read the holding of Lands Council v. [read post]
4 Jul 2008, 2:17 pm
In summary, for the reasons stated above, we DENY Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment and GRANT Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment on the first and second grounds (judicial review, licensure and premises requirements) and DENY the motion on the third ground relating to the unconstitutionality of warrantless inspections.Note that the Court subsequently granted the Plaintiffs' Motion for an Injunction Pending Appeal. [read post]
3 Jul 2008, 7:40 pm
Farms, Ltd. v. [read post]
3 Jul 2008, 3:17 pm
Hamdan’s counsel is now contending that the petition was revived when the Supreme Court ruled June 12 in Boumediene v. [read post]
3 Jul 2008, 2:58 pm
O'Darling v. [read post]
3 Jul 2008, 12:40 pm
Farms, Ltd. v. [read post]
2 Jul 2008, 3:13 pm
Farms, Ltd. v. [read post]
30 Jun 2008, 11:53 am
The Supreme Court noted that defense attorneys raised “an issue of first impression about punitive damages in maritime law, which falls within a federal court’s jurisdiction to decide in the manner of a common law court, subject to the authority of Congress to legislate otherwise if it disagrees with the judicial result. [read post]
29 Jun 2008, 11:51 pm
A desirable collegiality among judges can be adversely affected by a decision by one judge that another is biased, or (as a federal district judge was called upon to decide in Liljeberg v. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 3:36 pm
What a contrast to United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 1:54 pm
In the present case, District of Columbia v. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 3:36 am
ON APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE EIGHTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT FOR BREVARD COUNTY, STATE OF FLORIDA INITIAL BRIEF OF APPELLANT MARK S. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 6:52 pm
See United States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 2:45 pm
Const. art. 1, § 8, cl. 4 The District Court granted the United States' summary judgment motion and the debtor appealed. [read post]
24 Jun 2008, 12:53 pm
Yesterday in Rothgery v. [read post]
