Search for: "CO.1. Means" Results 8621 - 8640 of 16,767
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jan 2007, 5:36 am
Claiborne Hardware, 458 U.S. 886, 920 (1982); New York Times Co. v. [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 1:06 pm by Andrew & Danielle Mayoras
Danielle and Andy Mayoras are co-authors of Trial & Heirs: Famous Fortune Fights! [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 3:49 am by Russ Bensing
  That means if you test 1,000 people, 20 of them (two percent) will test positive, while only 1 has the disease. [read post]
19 Sep 2022, 7:33 pm by Dennis Crouch
Co., Ltd., 964 F.3d 1365 (Fed. [read post]
   The appellants, Rainy Sky and five other shipowning companies, each contracted to buy a ship from a shipbuilding company called Jinse Shipbuilding Co in Korea. [read post]
5 Aug 2017, 4:54 am by SHG
So does that mean I have horse in the race? [read post]
6 Oct 2019, 8:47 pm by Dave Wolkowitz
Dealing with an account that’s worth $1 million isn’t much different from dealing with an account worth of $10,000. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 5:27 am by Joel R. Brandes
 February 1, 2021 ​​ Appellate Division, First Department Appellate Divison affirms Charging Lien based upon account stated where no objection to invoices during year long representation               In Trafelet v Cipolla & Co., LLC, --- N.Y.S.3d ----, 2021 WL 189200, 2021 N.Y. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 5:31 am by Joel R. Brandes
 February 1, 2021 ​​ Appellate Division, First Department Appellate Divison affirms Charging Lien based upon account stated where no objection to invoices during year long representation               In Trafelet v Cipolla & Co., LLC, --- N.Y.S.3d ----, 2021 WL 189200, 2021 N.Y. [read post]
28 May 2020, 5:29 am by Schachtman
Of course, a challenge may be solely focused upon the expert witness’s credibility, such as when an expert witness testifies on many occasions only for one side in similar disputes, or for one whose political commitments render him unable to acknowledge the bona fides of any studies conducted by the adversarial parties.[1] If, however, the Rule 702 challenge stated an objection to the witness’s methodology, then the objection would count against both the opinion’s weight… [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 12:47 pm by D. Daxton White
Supp. 1186 (S.D.N.Y. 1989) (the mere fact that the account was churned is typically sufficient to a scheme or artifice to defraud within the meaning of 10b-5). [read post]