Search for: "Companies A, B, and C"
Results 8621 - 8640
of 12,883
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jul 2010, 12:44 pm
” Section 922(b) further expands the coverage of section 806 of SOX to include employees of nationally recognized statistical ratings organizations (NRSROs), including A.M. [read post]
29 May 2019, 12:33 pm
The Polish Personal Data Protection Office fined a data company PLN 943 000 (approximately EUR 220,000) (26.3.2019) – The company had failed to meet its information obligations under Article 14 of the GDPR in relation to over 6 million people, and many individuals were having their data processed without being aware of it. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 1:00 pm
Wrongfully sinking or destroying a vessel at sea or attempting to do so; (c). [read post]
27 May 2015, 9:16 am
Just b/c the platform is for-profit doesn’t mean the institution offering the course is for-profit. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 5:53 am
The result of these circumstances has been a chilling effect on legitimate business activity (as companies perceive a real risk of prosecution even in scenarios involving only the most remote and attenuated connection to foreign governments) and a costly misallocation of compliance resources…” By comparison Section 6 of the Bribery Act deals with bribery of a foreign public official section 6(5) defines foreign public official as meaning an individual who (a) holds a… [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 7:35 am
†For a detailed comparison of the classification for 2010 against the 2009 classification, see Appendix B. 6. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 11:44 am
” About the OK judgment, Simmons Hanly Conroy named Shareholder Paul Hanly stated in an interview with CNN’s Victor Blackwell: “This is a very positive ruling for all of the communities that we represent—more than 2,000 are in litigation—and this was important because for the first time, a court with a full body of evidence before it looked at both sides of the argument and concluded a) that there is an opioid epidemic, b) that it’s a public nuisance, and… [read post]
23 Mar 2014, 9:44 pm
Rehearing Grant The Court granted rehearing of a petition it had denied last year, ALLEN MARK DACUS, ELIZABETH C. [read post]
31 Aug 2019, 8:25 am
This was important because, for the first time, a court — with a full body of evidence before it — looked at both sides of the argument and concluded: A) That there is an opioid epidemic, B) that it’s a public nuisance and C) that, in this case, Johnson & Johnson was the cause of that nuisance. [read post]
24 Mar 2012, 7:01 am
While Alabama residents are currently being told that insurance company adjusters are supplied "free of charge" to help them with claims, Alabama insureds must remember insurance company adjusters work for insurance companies. [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 10:20 am
Machines (panelists from Facebook, Wikimedia, and Yelp) Session C: In-sourcing to Employees vs. [read post]
12 Nov 2007, 1:25 am
Applying these standards, federal courts have found that the following positions are “safety sensitive” such that random drug testing should be permitted: a) air traffic controllers; b) aircraft maintenance personnel; c) railroad safety inspectors; d) highway and motor carrier safety specialists; e) lock and dam operators; f) heavy equipment operators (e.g., forklift, tractor and crane operators). [read post]
13 Jan 2022, 4:22 am
Crime: Violations of the Securities Act of 1933, Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and Rule 10b-5(a) and (c). [read post]
12 Nov 2007, 1:25 am
Applying these standards, federal courts have found that the following positions are “safety sensitive” such that random drug testing should be permitted: a) air traffic controllers; b) aircraft maintenance personnel; c) railroad safety inspectors; d) highway and motor carrier safety specialists; e) lock and dam operators; f) heavy equipment operators (e.g., forklift, tractor and crane operators). [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 1:40 pm
Generally, to prove defamation, a plaintiff needs to prove “(a) a publication that is (b) false, (c) defamatory, and (d) unprivileged, and that (e) has a natural tendency to injure or that causes special damage. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 11:00 am
[4] Moodie R, Stuckler D, Montiero C, Sheron N, Neal B, Thamarangsi T, et al. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 3:36 am
Four and a half years later, following (a) extensive discovery including 14 witness depositions and review of 44,000 documents, (b) Justice Bransten’s denial of Suzanne’s motion to amend her complaint, (c) Justice Bransten’s award of over $100,000 in sanctions against Suzanne for discovery abuses, and (d) appellate affirmances of both of the preceding rulings (read here and here), on December 27, 2018, Justice Bransten issued a final decision and… [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 9:21 am
[§3135(2)(b)] Comment: you almost have to read this one twice to grasp how nasty this provision is. [read post]
6 Oct 2023, 5:12 am
’);… Federal Judge Steven C. [read post]
4 Aug 2017, 6:10 am
” More recently, the companies used the same strategy to target TVAddons, a Canadian-controlled website. [read post]
