Search for: "In re E.G."
Results 8621 - 8640
of 13,712
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jul 2020, 9:01 pm
See, e.g., In re Gardner v. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 11:41 am
Kristina expects this trend to remain relatively stable but notes there are benefits to using both a smaller number of firms (e.g. better rates, stronger relationships) and a larger number of firms (e.g. subject matter expertise, competitive rates). [read post]
23 Sep 2021, 10:00 am
Pix Credit: Council of Europe--Paris Principles at 25. [read post]
24 May 2023, 6:37 am
Part of Just Security’s work on accountability and election law. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 3:03 pm
But that doesn’t mean that we’re all idiots for deciding to attend law school. [read post]
19 Jan 2025, 5:00 pm
For the in-employment stage, decisions that do not fall under the scope of an “employment decision” include: decisions relating to employee benefits (such as leave, healthcare benefits or flexible working arrangements) and working environment (such as provision of lactation rooms and prayer rooms) – this is to ensure employers retain the flexibility to implement progressive HR practices, and design competitive and fair benefits packages depending on their employees’ and… [read post]
29 Apr 2012, 5:01 pm
However, a request for re-establishment of rights had been filed in the grandparent application before the filing date of the parent application. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 7:58 pm
UPDATE: Texas Supreme Court denied review 5/24/2019 CLAIM-FRACTURING CUM APPELLATE GALORE Natgasoline LLC v. [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 6:04 pm
The reason this approach works in the United States, especially with respect to common law is because the basic principles are built into the specific application of law to particular groups of related cases (e.g., person A hits person B). [read post]
6 May 2017, 8:08 am
A paper-development workshop for authors whose submissions have been shortlisted for revision and re-submission is being organised at Aarhus University (Denmark) back-to-back with a seminar on Global Value Chains, tentatively on 5 and 6 December 2017. [read post]
10 Sep 2018, 10:17 am
See, e.g., In re Cyclobenzaprine, 676 F.3d at1070–71. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 9:01 pm
Trump himself of being a captive to Russia (e.g., here). [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 4:57 pm
" (D.I. 492 at 9) Under this construction, to determine whether an enzyme literally meets the claim term, a skilled artisan would: (1) compare the enzyme's amino acid sequence to the sequences of known KARI enzymes having EC number 1.1.1.86 (D.I. 492 at 10; [p. 599] D.I. 494 at ¶ 45); and (2) test the enzyme for activity using a standard KARI assay, e.g., the assay described in a 1969 reference by Arfin & Umbarger 3 (D.I. 492 at 10; D.I. 495 at ¶¶ 41-43). [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 9:44 am
And it has generated some opposition especially from the criminal defense bar (e.g., here). [read post]
16 Apr 2022, 6:30 am
This is surprising given how much we disagree on some fundamental questions, such as whether states have the ability to pass laws consistent with the First Amendment that would require private social media platforms to re-platform candidates such as Donald Trump even if they consistently lie about election integrity and even if they foment violence. [read post]
13 Apr 2018, 8:58 am
Fear of conflict with existing statutory regimes, e.g., copyright and patent. [read post]
28 Jan 2017, 12:58 pm
It is grounded on notions that appear to be shared by American conservatives (see, e.g. here) that the basis of global trade is inherently corrupt and unfair that require more transparent and national interest enhancing objectives to serve the state willing to open its borders to trade (see, e.g., here).These objectives, a variation of which now appears to form the heart of emerging American trade policy, also appear to form the conceptual heart of the Socialist regional… [read post]
8 Sep 2019, 8:17 pm
That benefit is "special consideration and care" directed toward the avoidance of "re-victimization in the course of proceedings. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 3:18 pm
See In re Old Glory Condom Corp., 26 USPQ 2d 1216, 1220, n. 3 (TTAB 1993) (‘[I]ssuance of a trademark registration . . . is not a government imprimatur’). [read post]
4 Jun 2009, 11:04 am
E.g., In re Orthopedic Bone Screw Products Liability Litigation, 1997 WL 186325 (E.D. [read post]
