Search for: "State v. First Judicial District Court"
Results 8621 - 8640
of 9,094
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jun 2015, 6:52 am
The discovery obligations with respect to statistician expert witnesses vary considerably among state and federal courts. [read post]
7 Sep 2016, 10:07 am
In Fifield, the First Appellate District Court ruled that the promise of “at-will” employment alone is insufficient consideration to support a valid non-compete covenant under Illinois law. [read post]
3 May 2007, 10:20 am
A municipality sought a similar tort-based tax in District of Columbia v. [read post]
26 Aug 2021, 5:00 am
The court holds that they acted in bad faith and for an improper purpose—and not (as Powell claimed at the hearing) seeking to change the law like Thurgood Marshall did in Brown v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 5:00 pm
For purposes of this subsection, "emergency services personnel" shall include, but not be limited to, any paid or volunteer fireman, any person engaged in emergency first-aid or medical services and any law enforcement officer. [read post]
19 Jul 2024, 6:00 am
Nor were they limited to taxes on "persons and property," as stated in the Supreme Court's opinion last month in Moore v. [read post]
23 Sep 2020, 6:30 am
When conservatives controlled the courts, liberals were in favor of judicial restraint. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 11:40 am
The Second Appellate District stated that in determining whether a party has met and conferred met and conferred in good the court should consider the following relevant factors: 1. [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 4:26 pm
First, ING argued that, by submitting a loan application that falsely stated the borrower's salary information, YAM had breached the Broker Origination Agreement and Ramon had breached his loan agreement. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 4:58 pm
[and] recommended the billboard be taken down by 8:15 a.m. on June 16.Twelfth Judicial District Judge James W. [read post]
6 Apr 2018, 12:44 pm
The “foregone conclusion” doctrine was recently applied to the digital realm in United States v. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 11:07 am
,Petitioners,v.THE SUPERIOR COURT OF ORANGECOUNTY,Respondent;AURORA LOAN SERVICES, et al. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 9:02 am
This ruling is now on appeal to the federal Court of Appeals for the First Circuit, also situated in Boston.After defending the constitutionality of Section 3 in lower courts, the Obama Justice Department, pursuant to instructions from President Obama himself, did an about-face on February 23, 2011, and notified the First Circuit Court of Appeals that it would no longer defend the constitutionality of Section 3 in the Gill v. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 1:21 pm
In February of this year, the Federal District Court in Maryland in TEKsystems, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 6:51 am
Fuchsberg Law Center, untangles the procedural web woven in the recent US Supreme Court decision in Wallace v. [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 4:26 am
Fuchsberg Law Center, untangles the procedural web woven in the recent US Supreme Court decision in Wallace v. [read post]
9 Jan 2013, 6:36 pm
UBS AG, 342 F.Supp.2d 132 (2004), United States District Court, E.D. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 5:27 pm
Its first newsletter (July 2012) can be viewed here. [read post]
6 Aug 2009, 11:24 pm
Barr convinced the district court to find Bayer's patented compound, via 6,787,531, obvious. [read post]
