Search for: "Study v. State"
Results 8621 - 8640
of 15,013
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Apr 2014, 8:15 am
Manson, Graham v. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 7:03 am
– Fisher v. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 12:48 am
By Nicole KilloranPaine v. [read post]
6 Apr 2014, 9:01 pm
” But that assertion appears at best disingenuous to anyone who has carefully studied the Court’s case law. [read post]
6 Apr 2014, 8:13 am
Governor for the State of Alabama, (11th Cir., April 2, 2014), the U.S. 11th Circuit Court of Appeals dismissed a number of claims by an Odinist inmate, including his complaint that he was denied religious items (rune container, leather folder for study materials, quartz crystal and outdoor fire pit); claims of retaliation; security threat group designation; destruction of his artwork; and his challenge to the prison's faith-based honor dorm.In McKinley v. [read post]
5 Apr 2014, 11:52 pm
It's a useful exercise, or case study, to compare the two patents and, at a high level, their validity challenges. [read post]
5 Apr 2014, 11:07 am
., Ruth v. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 4:09 pm
Center for Biological Diversity, et al. v. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 12:27 pm
The Texas case is Batiste v. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 12:03 pm
E.g., Kelly v. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 8:12 am
Finally, I'll also explain why the article's new account of the original understanding of the Necessary and Proper Clause can serve as a useful framework for addressing some of the issues presented in Bond v. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 6:30 am
Relying on a 1953 decision of the Ohio Supreme Court, Masetta v. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 5:03 pm
Explains CONTU and section 108 study group. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 12:30 pm
Trustees of the California State University, S199557. [read post]
Appellate Court Shuts Out Trial Court in CEQA/ESA Double Header under Deferential Standard of Review
3 Apr 2014, 11:08 am
Both federal and state environmental review were necessitated for the project, however the appellate court only reviewed the relevant state law issues. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 9:46 am
Islamic Republic of Iran, et al. v. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 7:49 am
As the Court explained in Roth v. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 5:30 am
In 1944, however, in United States v. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 11:16 pm
The principal defendant in Harris is a private contractor which works with the state Department of Children and Family Services providing services to troubled families. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 9:01 pm
” Second, the drug is neither prescribed by a doctor or psychiatrist nor dispensed by a pharmacist, and has not been studied in the United States to determine its interaction with other drugs. [read post]
