Search for: "Claimant(s)"
Results 8641 - 8660
of 26,249
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Oct 2007, 1:49 am
Fili Shipping Company Limited (14th Claimant) and others (Appellants) [2007] UKHL 40 United Utilities Water plc (Appellants) v. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 10:00 pm
With them were Suppiah’s two boys, aged one and 11, and Sakinat’s two year old daughter. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 12:20 pm
In particular, the Court of Appeals looked at the definition of “compensability,” which is a three-part definition: 1) A Plaintiff’s injury must be caused by an accident. 2) The Plaintiff must show that he or she sustained an injury “out of” employment. 3) The Claimant must show that the injury was sustained during the course of employment. [read post]
27 May 2013, 11:36 pm
Supreme Court’s 1991 decision in Virginia Bankshares, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Sep 2016, 5:55 am
The claimant turned 18 in 1982. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 12:43 pm
If the impairment doesn't fall under one of the listings, the analysis continues to the final two questions to determine if the claimant is still able to work. [read post]
9 Dec 2015, 12:23 am
The claimant’s position was that it was the exclusive licensee of various recordings from GLPL, the company through which Mr Lorenz operated before his death, and was the owner of copyright in the remainder of the relevant recordings by virtue of an assignment from the same. [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 1:06 pm
Leaving that decision in the hands of exemption claimants would effectively read “substantial” out of RFRA’s text and subvert Congress’s reason for adding it in the first place. [read post]
10 Oct 2022, 1:48 pm
Typically, the decedent’s surviving relatives must file a suit within one year from the date of death or one year from when the claimant should have discovered the malpractice. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 9:56 am
Any rusted or exposed S-hooks? [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 8:00 am
Employee appealed the Board’s decision.The Appellate Division affirmed the Appeal Board’s decision, explaining "Whether a claimant has engaged in disqualifying misconduct is a factual question for the Board to resolve and its determination will not be disturbed if supported by substantial evidence," noting that “It is well settled that failure to abide by a known policy of the employer can constitute disqualifying misconduct. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 4:47 am
The reasonable recipient of Worldwide's letter would not have understood the threat of proceedings as being limited to the supply of services (which was excluded from liability under section 21(1)).At this stage, things look quite good for the claimants. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 2:16 pm
The claimants challenged the registrar’s refusal by filing an application pursuant to Article 791 CCP, which aims at the obligation of the registrar to proceed to registration by virtue of a court order. [read post]
9 Jun 2017, 2:01 am
Unison’s case was that the regime under the Fees Order – the combination of the level of fees and the criteria for remission – is such that many claimants are unable to afford to bring claims in the tribunals. [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 4:01 pm
It mixes the discussion about global delisting with that about claimant’s standing. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 3:47 pm
True, sometimes it's not. [read post]
15 Nov 2009, 9:09 pm
Batchelder's class, at New York University made a presentation at the annual meeting of the National Association of Settlement Purchasers (NASP) entitled "Factoring and the Structured Settlement Tax Subsidy" One of the points that NYU has chosen to focus on in its promotion of Babener's appearance at NASP is: "To help claimants avoid spending too quickly, structured settlements are subsidized at federal, state, and local levels by a tax exclusion… [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 6:50 am
That’s the beauty of sports. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 2:50 pm
It was concerned with the Claimants’ position as private individuals. [read post]
Case Preview: Protect Rural England (Kent) v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government
27 Jan 2021, 2:30 am
The Claimant’s liability for the Roxhill’s costs was capped so that the global figure did not exceed the £10,000 cap. [read post]
