Search for: "GROUP v. STATE" Results 8641 - 8660 of 37,543
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Sep 2018, 3:01 am by Walter Olson
Jarrett Dieterle, R Street Institute] California fisheries and Chevron deference: “An Otter Travesty by the Administrative State” [Ilya Shapiro on Cato cert amicus petition in California Sea Urchin Commission v. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 9:38 am by Zachary C. Jackson
On Friday, Google asked the United States District Court for the Northern District of California to dismiss another lawsuit (Santiago v. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 12:38 am
" Â Today's Supreme Court Action "As expected, the Supreme Court's final sitting of the year 2009 today yielded no decisions -- including the long-awaited Citizens United v. [read post]
4 Dec 2017, 5:10 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Making strategic choices: How and why Indian groups advocated for Federal Recognition from 1977-2012. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 5:47 am by Rick Klau
Augsburg is a publisher affiliated with the ELCA, which is the largest Lutheran denomination in the United States. [read post]
16 Apr 2013, 6:39 am by Karin Retzer
On February 27, 2013, the European Article 29 Working Party (a group comprising representatives from all of the data protection authorities of the EU Member States, referred to in this articles as “WP29”) issued an Opinion on the privacy and data protection implications of the use of apps on mobile devices (“the Opinion”). [read post]
20 May 2008, 9:43 am
On May 5, 2008, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York issued an interesting opinion in Adelphia Recovery Trust v. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 10:46 pm by Gilles Cuniberti
On 20 June 2013, the Court of Justice of the European Union ruled in Impacto Azul Lda v. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 5:43 am by Lauren E. Koster
Koster is an associate in Fox Rothschild LLP's Family Law Practice Group. [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 2:39 pm by Ilyse Schuman
The measure states further that a court – in deciding whether to certify the class – may take into consideration an employer’s written nondiscrimination policy “only to the extent that the employer demonstrates that the policy has been consistently and effectively used to prevent and, where necessary, promptly correct discrimination against the group. [read post]