Search for: "Good v. State"
Results 8641 - 8660
of 44,400
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Mar 2008, 4:12 pm
United States v. [read post]
17 Nov 2018, 12:10 pm
With the benefit of 25 years of hindsight, a look at some of those amicus briefs reveals a good deal about the scientific and legal acumen of the “friends of the court. [read post]
23 Feb 2020, 7:17 pm
(Art Credit: Benton Martin)The first instance was United States v. [read post]
4 May 2007, 2:00 pm
United States v. [read post]
19 May 2011, 12:09 pm
In 2002, the United States Supreme Court handed down Atkins v. [read post]
13 Jan 2025, 2:48 pm
In LKQ v. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 4:00 am
United States v. [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 5:34 am
United States. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 10:23 am
Pfizer v. [read post]
5 Oct 2013, 5:08 pm
In pertinent part, CPL 240.40(2)(b)(v) reads as follows: “2. [read post]
30 May 2024, 12:21 pm
United States, 153 F. [read post]
25 Dec 2015, 1:42 am
Ferras; United States of America v. [read post]
20 May 2012, 5:31 pm
Well, the Ninth Circuit just said in Pom Wonderful v. [read post]
13 Nov 2012, 6:53 am
In fact, Steve represented the taxpayer in the controlling Ohio Supreme Court case (Funtime v. [read post]
26 May 2015, 7:56 am
State v. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 3:25 am
A good illustration of a latent defect can be found in Acme Galvanizing Co., Inc. v. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 6:24 am
The Cloverleaf court said that Bray was no longer good law because the New York Court of Appeals held in Tanges v. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 11:11 am
Such a claim would trivialize free speech protection in the way that the Court in Rumsfeld v. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 8:37 am
In Phelps v. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 5:30 am
In R (on the application of Naik) v Secretary of State for the Home Department ([2011] EWCA Civ 1546) the Court of Appeal confirmed that the exclusion of an Indian Muslim public speaker from the United Kingdom after making statements which breached the Home Office’s “unacceptable behaviours policy” was lawful, and that any interference with his rights was justified. [read post]
