Search for: "Matter of Mark T."
Results 8641 - 8660
of 16,585
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jun 2014, 10:14 am
Hana Financial’s petition asks “[w]hether the jury or the court determines whether use of an older mark may be tacked to a newer one. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 2:26 pm
So: you don’t have to register your trademark to own the trademark rights, and you don’t have to register your trademark in order to have a federal cause of action for trademark infringement. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 1:56 pm
Fighting Illegal Stops in Massachusetts Police Officers Believe That Teenagers Are Up To Something Illegal It doesn’t matter whether you live in the city or the suburbs. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 11:14 am
§ 1052, registration of a mark may be denied if that mark "Consists of or comprises immoral, deceptive, or scandalous matter; or matter which may disparage or falsely suggest a connection with persons, living or dead, institutions, beliefs, or national symbols, or bring them into contempt, or disrepute. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 6:00 am
He also decided that the matter couldn’t fall under provincial jurisdiction, because provincial regulation would impair the core of the federal power with respect to members of First Nations pursuant to the Constitution Act. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 4:00 am
The website isn’t a clear infringement, but it also isn’t “steaming bulls–t” as a matter of law. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 2:09 am
Class 25 was a different matter: Since the Class 25 goods covered by the mark formed no part of Friis's appeal, the Cancellation Division’s decision to reject the application for a declaration of invalidity became final with respect to those goods.Cat's pyjamas: a new product line for LV? [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 2:04 pm
One more thing: You know, of course, this ain’t over. [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 1:06 pm
Should nonlawyers be permitted to be "officers" in law firms, even if they don't have an ownership interest? [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 8:13 am
Second, in Jewel, “[t]he new firms represented the clients under fee agreements entered into between the client and the old firm. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 8:01 pm
Surely, then, the examiners must be making copious use of the prior art that has been submitted by applicants.The answer is—maybe not, at least based on a study reported in the respected journal, Research Policy, Christopher Cotropia, Mark Lemley and Bhaven Sampat, “Do applicant patent citations matter? [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 3:10 pm
I couldn't link to the text. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 11:59 am
Far from containing the “plain statement” necessary to preclude application of federal discovery rules, Société Nationale Industrielle Aérospatiale v. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 10:19 am
There ain't nuthin' rigged here. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 9:00 am
Officer Mark McCullough indicated that the sheer number of hit-and-run accidents hasn’t climbed dramatically in the last five years, but the egregiousness of the cases has grown. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 5:56 am
Provided Facebook can mitigate the privacy risks, however, it appears that this feature marks an improved approach to frictionless sharing. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 4:45 am
KIND argued that the Bristol-Myers rule didn’t apply because the Clif marks weren’t prominent enough and weren’t universally recognized, and because the KIND trade dress was remembered better than the name. [read post]
15 Jun 2014, 5:54 pm
by Mark I. [read post]
14 Jun 2014, 7:15 am
@LegalTalkNet – “When you are slow to your respond to your clients, marketing efforts won’t matter”, said @AdamCamras. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 7:00 pm
But Council endorsement of the Guiding Principles will mark the end of the beginning. [read post]
