Search for: "State v. C. S. S. B." Results 8641 - 8660 of 15,310
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Apr 2023, 5:11 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Compliance starts far earlier than you anticipate b/c of operational and engineering runup time. [read post]
28 Aug 2009, 3:07 am
Supreme Court's standard for determining what is obscene: In Miller v. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 1:33 pm by Daniel Estrin
Clarke and a 1992 ruling from the Supreme Court in Arkansas v. [read post]
10 Nov 2008, 7:43 pm
  Here’s what Special Trial Judge Robert Armen said:   In commencing the instant action,  [Petitioner's Counsel]  has disrespected the clear bar of section 6330(c)(2)(B), and he has done so without principled justification. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 9:54 am by Charon QC
In Balogh, Lord Denning stated that, where there was not this urgency, the most appropriate course was to refer the matter to the Attorney General so that he or she could consider bringing proceedings in the Queen’s Bench Division. [read post]
11 Mar 2008, 8:46 am
Phillips, No. 07-0522 Grant of habeas petition ordering conviction be vacated based on state's Brady violation is vacated in part as to barring of retrial of count of depraved indifference murder as petitioner had not exhausted his state remedies with respect to that relief. [read post]
Do the State of the Union or NSS signal President Trump’s acceptance of the law on these matters? [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 6:00 am
Code §§ 2703(a), (b) and (c) to disclose certain records and contents of electronic communications relating to an Apple e-mail address. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 9:15 am by Schachtman
  For instance, a third factor C could be causing both A and B. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 10:34 am by Larkin Reynolds
  First, section 1021 of the NDAA “affirm[ed]” the AUMF’s grant of authority for: Armed Forces of the United States to detain covered persons (as defined in subsection (b)) pending disposition under the laws of war. [read post]