Search for: "State v. C. S. S. B."
Results 8641 - 8660
of 15,310
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Feb 2014, 12:35 pm
Although federal contractors and subcontractors will be required to comply with Subparts A, B, D, and E of both new rules by March 24, 2014, the obligations in Subpart C of the new rules will be phased in. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 9:57 am
See, e.g., State v. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 7:39 am
C. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 7:39 am
C. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 7:39 am
C. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 6:54 am
The Court of Appeal in The Hague has made a number of rather bold leaps in trade mark law to get from A to B to C, which are all the braver based as they are on remarks in opinions of Advocates General. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 6:53 am
The court rejected this argument for the following reasons: a) The court could not compare the photocopy with the actual register; b) the regulation permits the Registrar to call for additional representations if not satisfied, which did not occur, indicating that the Registrar was satisfied; and c) the court applied the section 51 presumption that registration is prima facie evidence of validity. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 12:00 am
Rolex (case C-98/13). [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 8:58 am
A question raised, but not answered — since the defendant didn’t argue it — in Judge Neil Gorsuch’s characteristically scholarly opinion in United States v. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 6:28 am
In Monday’s post, I introduced the recent Minneci v. [read post]
18 Feb 2014, 1:51 pm
Besides the most famous Model T, Ford also produced the Models A, B, C, F, K, N, R, S, T and Y between the years 1903 and 1938. [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 8:36 am
Kaspersky, the court cautions against a blank check to an interactive computer service’s ability to invoke the “otherwise objectionable” language from Section 230(c)(2)(B). __ Ugh. [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 6:38 am
Unit B 1982). [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 4:36 am
Issues like federalism and state action doctrine do bear on 1A issues. [read post]
16 Feb 2014, 7:31 pm
Subsection (c) now states: A lawyer shall make reasonable efforts to prevent the inadvertent or unauthorized disclosure of, or unauthorized access to, information relating to the representation of a client.Suffolk's Andy Perlman was involved in redrafting this provision, and is quite aware of the difficulties for modern lawyers in a technologically complex world.The article in the Times discusses the recent Supreme Court decision, Clapper v. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 4:16 pm
Sokn v. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 9:35 am
As you suggest, I was fortunate to have studied with the late Professor C. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 6:19 am
Code § 1125(c)”. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 5:43 am
Section 301(c)(2) of the Pennsylvania’s Workman’s Compensation Act, 77 P.S. [read post]
