Search for: "State v. So"
Results 8641 - 8660
of 117,803
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Aug 2009, 2:31 am
That's why criminal cases have captions like State of Ohio v. [read post]
6 Sep 2009, 10:43 pm
State v. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 12:52 pm
United States v. [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 5:15 am
The challenges, however, hit their own high water mark when the Supreme Court granted review in King v. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 1:45 am
In the last two years the Supreme Court has grappled with this conundrum in various ways: in relation to control orders; allegations of terrorist financing (SSHD v AF [2009] UKHL 28); compensation for those who have suffered miscarriage of justice (R (Adams) v Secretary of State for Justice [2011] UKSC 18); and criminal conduct as the subject of disciplinary proceedings (R (G) v The Governors of X School [2011] UKSC 30). [read post]
13 Oct 2015, 4:03 pm
While the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in its recent judgment Schrems v Data Protection Commissioner (discussed here), does not mention the words “measures of mass surveillance” it states that it is concerned about measures “authoris[ing], on a generalised basis, storage of all the personal data of all the persons”. [read post]
16 Apr 2021, 5:00 am
United States Supreme CourtThe United States Supreme Court recently issued a notable decision in the case of Ford Motor Co. v. [read post]
9 Oct 2018, 5:02 am
If so, the case might never have reached the appellate level. [read post]
15 Nov 2019, 9:15 am
” Rath v. [read post]
3 Jun 2013, 12:44 pm
Six short weeks after the April 22 argument in Hillman v. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 5:03 am
A special contribution is a contribution deemed so exceptional in nature that it justifies a departure from the sharing principle starting point of equal (50:50) division of the marital assets. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 1:00 pm
The committee has included an understanding in the resolution of advice and consent that addresses this point (see section V below). [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 2:01 pm
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Idaho. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 5:36 am
” Orin suggests that a passage from United States v. [read post]
14 Jul 2021, 6:46 am
In support of this, he cited the view of Mr Justice Colman in Navigas v Enron. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 10:08 am
In United States v. [read post]
12 Mar 2020, 8:11 am
If so, this opens up the door to unlimited liability for a panoply of state law claims we don’t normally see against Internet services–like aiding-and-abetting trespass to real property. [read post]
31 Jul 2024, 6:48 am
Konrath State Legislator Doesn’t Understand That He Works for the Government–Attwood v. [read post]
2 Feb 2022, 3:22 am
In doing so the court will take into account assumptions or presumptions such as the principle of legality. [read post]
22 Jun 2022, 4:25 am
(quoting United States v. [read post]
