Search for: "US v. John Doe"
Results 8641 - 8660
of 11,109
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 May 2018, 3:44 am
Specifically, this is to prevent “hybrid dividends” that receive a deduction in the foreign country when paid to the U.S. and when received in the United States, resulting in effectively no tax on that flow of income.[8] The participation exemption excludes ordinary foreign profits paid to parent corporations in the form of dividends, but it does not exclude capital gains. [read post]
4 Dec 2008, 11:02 am
"Not surprisingly, John's concerns largely parallel ours. [read post]
16 Jan 2011, 2:50 pm
Green and many others get the concept of freedom in order to maintain a strong society, the government does not. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 3:35 am
What does that mean? [read post]
16 Aug 2024, 8:36 am
Raimondo, which “overruled” Chevron v. [read post]
1 Feb 2022, 1:21 am
And I'm like, what does that mean? [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 11:50 am
"I think history often tells us what the Constitution means," he says, "or at least it can tell us what the Constitution doesn't mean. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 3:08 am
Societe Produits de Nestle S.A. v. [read post]
11 Oct 2022, 2:20 pm
But in the wake of the court’s June decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
21 Jul 2024, 9:02 pm
” John F. [read post]
29 May 2019, 6:01 am
In Damus v. [read post]
20 Nov 2022, 9:55 am
Cockrum v. [read post]
10 Sep 2018, 10:17 am
The outcome in Acorda v. [read post]
22 Dec 2006, 1:46 am
Summaries are prepared by Law Librarians and are not official statements of the Wyoming Supreme Court.Case Name: Haney v. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 8:30 am
John's Church in the Wilderness v. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 5:44 pm
Likewise, even Supreme Court justices who believe that the government may not endorse religion think that it’s fine for government officials to express religious views in their speeches — here, for instance, is the view of Justices John Paul Stevens and Ruth Bader Ginsburg in Van Orden v. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 10:17 am
In McCulloch v. [read post]
2 May 2018, 4:12 pm
It is this paradigm for which the Court uses the Reese’s Peanut Butter Cup metaphor: does blending chocolate (claim form) with peanut butter (service records showing treatment of a condition in service) really make an informal claim? [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 11:12 am
Analysis Midway through a federal government lawyer’s plea Tuesday for unrestricted power for police to use new GPS technology to track cars and trucks on public roads, Chief Justice John G. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 5:01 am
From Fagan v. [read post]
