Search for: "Companies A, B, and C"
Results 8661 - 8680
of 12,883
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Feb 2012, 4:21 pm
These includes the City of New York (Defendant A), a major owner and operator of leading power distribution lines in New York (Defendant B), a highway/street paving contractor (Defendant C) and a masonry contractor company (Defendant D). [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 12:58 pm
– Judge C owns 350 shares of Exxon Mobil stock. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 9:57 am
§ 1607.4(c)); El v. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 6:07 am
B. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 5:25 am
That is why the court reversed the denial of certification under Rule 23(c)(4) and 23(b)(2). [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 5:00 am
Rule 23(c)(4) provides that “when appropriate, an action may be brought or maintained as a class action with respect to particular issues. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 11:11 pm
Did the company through its Litigator service: (1) “reproduce, publish, telecommunicate to the public, sell, rent, or hold itself out as the author or owner of court documents? [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 9:00 pm
Entity Designation Domicile of Entity Commission Rate Services Provided Actual Services Shell Company A UK 40% of sales of Greek distributor Marketing Did not perform any services Shell Company B UK 26% of sales of Greek distributor Marketing None listed Shell Company C UK 35% of sales of Greek distributor Marketing Did not perform any true services Indicia of Bribery and Corruption What are some of the factors that demonstrate the distributors… [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 5:01 pm
G 2/04 [3.2.5(b)]). [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 4:38 pm
' ""The judge also certified common issues raised by Thomson’s defences: 'Does Thomson have a public policy defence to copyright infringement or to the violation of moral rights based on (a) fair dealing, (b) the open court principle, (c) freedom of expression, (d) the necessity of using the idea of the court document as it is expressed, or (e) a business or professional custom or public policy reason that would justify reproducing, publishing,… [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 4:20 pm
The testimony of a carpenter from Defendant C contains an admission that he built two staircases at the job site. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 12:18 pm
B. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 8:00 am
The journalist and publishing company were fined over 16,000 euro. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 8:00 am
It states that she: “…shall provide consulting services as reasonably requested by the Company concerning Company matters with which you have been involved or have knowledge; provided that, in each case, (a) the Company shall provide you with reasonable advance notice when requesting such services or assistance, (b) the Company shall exercise reasonable efforts to schedule any services or assistance requested so as to not unreasonably… [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 7:29 am
The Seventh Circuit opined that certification of a class with respect to the lawfulness of the challenged practices under Rule 23(c)(4) would be proper. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 5:38 am
Paragraph (b) applies to lawyers who have supervisory authority over the work of a nonlawyer. such nonlawyers within or outside the firm. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 5:37 am
(c) Any communication made pursuant to this Rule shall include the name and office address of at least one lawyer or law firm responsible for its content. [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 8:56 pm
C-2011/09/04 decided on September 30, 2011). [read post]
25 Feb 2012, 6:30 pm
In a post The Patent War to End All Patent Wars, John C. [read post]
25 Feb 2012, 5:19 pm
Another change to the FRBP is rule 3002.1 (a) and (b), Notice of Payment change filed no later than 21 days before the new payment is effective. [read post]
