Search for: "Judge v. United States" Results 8661 - 8680 of 35,309
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Feb 2016, 6:55 am by Lee E. Berlik
As the United States Supreme Court recognized in New York Times Co. v. [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 7:51 am by Ken
United States District Judge Michael M. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 11:51 am by Mike
McBride is a pro se prisoner at Pelican Bay State Prison's complaint that he was improperly validated as a gang member which resulted in his indefinite placement in the Secure Housing Unit (SHU). [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 10:31 pm by Sherrilyn Ifill
But the decision by states to elect their judges was a deliberate, conscious choice. [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 8:39 pm
Despite the judge's proffered psychological evidence of suffering from an anxious state of mind due to a strained marriage and recognizable prior service record, the public confidence which had been lost was irreparable" INJURY AND TORT LAW, SPORTS LAW Roberts v. [read post]
14 Dec 2007, 6:16 am
  Here are excerpts:For two decades, the United States has pursued, prosecuted and sentenced cocaine offenders in a way that borders on insanity -- targeting petty criminals over serious drug dealers -- while fostering contempt, instead of respect, for the policies that have sent tens of thousands to jail. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 9:53 am
The United States Supreme Court on January 11, 2012, rendered a decision in Perry v. [read post]
19 Nov 2011, 8:54 am by INFORRM
  Even in the United States figures produced by freedom of expression NGO Article 19 the average libel damages award is US$471,221. [read post]
1 May 2019, 3:13 am
In either case, a declarant is subject to United States perjury laws if willful or knowing false statements are made.When the declaration is signed in the United States, the laws of the United States apply automatically. [read post]
8 Oct 2009, 9:17 am by Richard Strong
The Sixth Circuit today issued an opinion in United States v. [read post]
28 Oct 2016, 11:49 am by MBettman
“Therefore, this court and the United States Supreme Court agree that statutes of repose are to be read as enacted and not with an intent to circumvent legislatively imposed time limits. [read post]