Search for: "STATE V. POWERS"
Results 8661 - 8680
of 41,393
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Mar 2016, 4:25 am
Oklahoma is probably the least likely state one would imagine to be the epicenter of workers' compensation controversy, but since the state did a "reform" which drastically altered some qualification for benefits as well as introducing an opt-out program, the state has been embroiled in dispute.Last week, of course, the state's Workers' Compensation Commission declared opt-out to be unconstitutional, failing the state's… [read post]
2 Oct 2017, 6:54 am
In Janus v. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 11:22 am
The City of San Diego suing San Diego State University?! [read post]
13 May 2014, 6:45 am
The ECJ today handed down a case in a landmark decision regarding data protection and the Internet (Case C-131/12 Google Spain SL, Google Inc. v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 2:39 pm
In Matter of Wallach v. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 6:47 pm
The elegant solution is that Article Five contemplates only prospective action by Congress for a constitutional amendment because "[t]he power to propose is . . . a prospective power, and does not entail any authority to modify the terms of a proposed amendment once it has been offered for the consideration of the States. [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 3:36 am
Raich, 545 U.S. 1, 27, 29 (2005); United States v. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 6:57 am
SME Steel Contractors, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 2:58 pm
(Eugene Volokh) No, says the district court in United States v. [read post]
18 Jun 2021, 5:07 pm
Grp. v. [read post]
18 May 2016, 9:59 am
Spokeo, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 8:02 am
The decision to withdraw or not – the decision whether to give notice under the applicable EU treaty – is for Parliament to make, not the party in power in Parliament; aka the “gov’t” or the Crown. [111] for the reasons we have set out, we hold the Secretary of State does not have power under the Crown’s prerogative to give notice pursuant to Article 50 of the TEU for the United Kingdom to withdraw from the European Union. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 3:35 pm
Sanders v. [read post]
17 Aug 2006, 10:58 am
Amy Baron-Evans, the National Sentencing Resource Counsel to the Federal Public and Community Defenders, has produced an extraordinary memorandum entitled "The Continuing Struggle for Fair, Effective and Constitutional Sentencing After United States v. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 5:36 pm
Courtesy of Professor Berman, here’s the link to United States v. [read post]
18 May 2012, 1:21 pm
United States v. [read post]
26 Aug 2012, 7:36 am
In Ristvey v. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 6:31 am
In Met v. [read post]
