Search for: "Study v. State" Results 8661 - 8680 of 15,013
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Mar 2014, 2:45 pm by Priscilla Smith
S 2000bb(b) (1).[3] Smith, 494 U.S. at 887 (equating evaluation of centrality with, inter alia, substantiality) (citing United States v. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 1:15 pm
United States, 552 U.S. 85 (2007), with the United States Sentencing Commission’s Guideline ranges for drug trafficking violations, as did the Honorable John Gleeson, District Judge for the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, in United States v. [read post]
22 Mar 2014, 8:51 am by paola Aurucci
The Supreme Court ruled in Province of North Cotabato v. [read post]
21 Mar 2014, 3:58 pm by Lyle Denniston
This was the first full-scale trial since the Supreme Court’s decision last June in United States v. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 11:50 am by Jonathan Bailey
After the Second Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in the Viacom v. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 10:00 am by Dan Ernst
This claim failed in court — most famously in Flood v. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 5:19 am by Mark Graber
United States (1926), but they never acknowledge that the Brandeis dissent was rooted in a commitment to participatory democracy that Reynolds did not share. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 4:25 am by SHG
  And so the government came down so hard on her that even the 7th Circuit dissenter in United States v. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 3:23 am
The latest issue of the International Studies Quarterly (Vol. 58, no. 1, March 2014) is out. [read post]
19 Mar 2014, 5:11 pm by Epstein Becker Green
Olsen The United States Supreme Court declined to review the Second Circuit’s decision in Irizarry v. [read post]
19 Mar 2014, 9:00 am by Paula Bremner
It has been 15 years since the last brand v brand challenge of a biologic patent in Canada. [read post]
18 Mar 2014, 1:00 pm
Clifford Wallace Inn of Court and prior to that, served for two years as an associate member of the Fiorenzo V. [read post]
18 Mar 2014, 8:29 am
” The defendant did not dispute Thomas’ expertise in music licensing, nor did it take issue with the five factors that Thomas stated, in her experience, usually affect the negotiated value of a music license. [read post]