Search for: "Court v. State"
Results 8681 - 8700
of 208,278
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jun 2013, 7:52 am
The United States Supreme Court today decided United States Agency for International Development v. [read post]
21 Mar 2007, 4:45 am
In Catawba Indian Tribe v. [read post]
10 Feb 2007, 1:55 am
It affirmed all the other verdicts and remanded the case to the Circuit Court for new sentencing.Upon the State's writ of certiorari, this Court reasoned that verdicts are inconsistent if they are "lacking consistency; not compatible with another fact or claim. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 1:22 pm
United States, a case that raises a question I've written about previously ad nauseam--whether the Court's June 2015 decision in Johnson v. [read post]
29 Jun 2024, 1:39 pm
State of Washington v. [read post]
3 May 2022, 11:54 am
United States (1928) and Goldman v. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 8:33 pm
Still no word from the Florida Supreme Court on two criminal appeals I’ve been watching: State v. [read post]
1 Dec 2006, 4:10 am
Yesterday's decision, Paulson v. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 9:56 am
Recently the United States Supreme Court decided, in the case of Sessions v. [read post]
29 Sep 2015, 4:00 am
A political subdivision of the State may provide for the defense and indemnification of its officers and employees sued in state or federal court involving the performance of official duties Bonilla v Town of Hempstead, 2015 NY Slip Op 06916, Appellate Division, Second DepartmentFormer Hempstead Town Clerk Mark A. [read post]
9 Jan 2018, 6:09 am
The court also denied certiorari in two cases:Knight v. [read post]
27 Mar 2016, 11:43 am
Mabry v. [read post]
20 May 2007, 11:05 pm
It is the failure of the trial court to ask the questions on the amended voir dire request that is the subject of this appeal.In Maryland, the sole purpose of voir dire is to ensure a fair and impartial jury by determining the existence of cause for disqualification and not, as in many other states, to include the intelligent exercise of preemptory challenges. [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 7:32 pm
Wachter v. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 6:12 am
In Rafael Mattaranz v. [read post]
2 May 2021, 7:54 am
New Jersey asserts PennEast Pipeline cannot take state-controlled land based on the state court proceeding. [read post]
14 Oct 2020, 12:09 pm
The US Supreme Court heard oral arguments Tuesday in the cases of United States v. [read post]
25 Nov 2015, 2:16 am
She stated that the Secretary of State did not seriously consider the most cost-effective form which such an inquiry might take or the “bigger picture” in that it was in the public interest to properly inquire about events of this magnitude and the importance of setting the record straight as well as providing truth to the relatives and survivors, Harrison v UK applied. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 11:44 am
” Finch v. [read post]
15 Aug 2022, 6:19 am
Here are the updated materials in Coyote Band of Pomo Indians v. [read post]
