Search for: "Does 1 - 29"
Results 8681 - 8700
of 13,860
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 May 2013, 2:09 pm
Lexis 84, at *28-29. [read post]
15 May 2013, 9:33 am
The Patent Owner does not arguethat these claims are not indefinite. [read post]
14 May 2013, 2:36 pm
Doe where there is no pressure to engage in a religious practice or activity, but merely exposure to religious symbols; and (3) whether the government “endorses” religion when it engages in a religion-neutral action that inci [read post]
14 May 2013, 6:38 am
October 29, 1963: Mrs. [read post]
14 May 2013, 12:22 am
” (Claim 1 of the ’720 patent, Lourie p 32). [read post]
13 May 2013, 7:26 pm
The IRS Regs at 1.501(c)(4)–1(a)(2)(ii) make it clear that “the promotion of social welfare does not include participation in political campaigns on behalf of or in opposition to any political candidate. [read post]
13 May 2013, 5:01 pm
However, this aspect cannot be taken into consideration for the definition of the problem to be solved, as claim 1 of the main request does not define the concentration of the taxane to be administered to the patient. [read post]
13 May 2013, 4:58 am
Does the complexity deprive the exemption of utility? [read post]
12 May 2013, 5:39 pm
In particular, it does not apply to the preparation of tender documents. [read post]
11 May 2013, 10:06 pm
Sharia does not require a majority vote. [read post]
11 May 2013, 4:00 am
However, as a matter of policy, the DEP does not accept doctors' notes indicating an indefinite period of leave. [read post]
9 May 2013, 9:20 am
The FLSA, 29 U.S.C. [read post]
8 May 2013, 5:00 am
(2) Does Moradi-Shalal v. [read post]
7 May 2013, 10:55 am
Apr. 29, 2013) (J. [read post]
7 May 2013, 1:42 am
Following her March 29 ruling, various groups of plaintiffs petitioned Judge Buchwald to try to obtain leave to amend their complaints. [read post]
6 May 2013, 7:44 am
Louisiana, SCT Docket 11-9953 (April 29, 2013) after hearing argument. [read post]
6 May 2013, 5:38 am
There were a handful of resolved cases reported: Full Fact v The Sun, Clause 1, 06/05/2013; Mr David Murray v Sutton Guardian, Clause 1, 03/05/2013; A woman v The Sun on Sunday, Clause 9, 03/05/2013; and Dr Carol Uren v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 03/05/2013. [read post]
5 May 2013, 7:33 pm
Klein persisted at a September meeting, and the 29-member board decided, on a 7-5 vote, to go along with him. [read post]
5 May 2013, 7:12 am
It also held that RLUIPA does not authorize damage claims against officials in their individual capacities.In United States v. [read post]
3 May 2013, 4:48 pm
Id. at 1. [read post]
